Monday, August 06, 2007
4 Indicted in Los Angeles Property-Flipping Scheme
Joseph Babajian, 54, West Los Angeles, Kyle Grasso, 36, Santa Monica, Lila Rizk, 40, Trabuco Canyon, and Scott Robinson, 44, Dana Point, all of California, were charged in an 85-page indictment returned by a federal grand jury in Los Angeles, California . According to the indictment, the two real estate agents and two state-licensed real estate appraisers were indicted for allegedly participating in a massive mortgage fraud scam that caused more than $40 million in losses to federally insured banks.
During the alleged scheme, Babajian and Grasso worked at, and were part owners of, Prudential California Realty. Rizk and Robinson were appraisers licensed by the State of California. All four defendants were charged with conspiracy, bank fraud, and loan fraud. Additionally, Babajian and Grasso were charged with money laundering.
According to the 35-count indictment, the defendants and others previously charged in the case were involved in a wide-ranging and sophisticated conspiracy to defraud mortgage lenders by obtaining inflated mortgage loans on homes in some of California’s most expensive neighborhoods, including Beverly Hills, Bel Air, Holmby Hills and Malibu. Among those previously charged in the case are:
Charles Elliott Fitzgerald, 47, Newbury Park;
Mark Alan Abrams, 45, Los Angeles;
Nicole LaViolette, 37, Palm Springs;
Jamieson Matykowski, 33, Laguna Niguel; and
Timothy Holland, 35, Santa Ana.
Fitzgerald, who is in custody, is scheduled to go on trial on November 13 on a host of federal charges related to the alleged scheme. The other four have pleaded guilty to charges related to the scheme and are pending sentencing.
The indictment charges that the defendants and the previously-charged conspirators sent false documentation, including bogus purchase contracts and appraisals, to the victim banks to deceive them into unwittingly funding mortgage loans that were hundreds of thousands of dollars higher than the homes actually cost.
Allegedly, the scheme was executed through a series of acts:
Grasso, Fitzgerald and Abrams bought homes at their true market values, requiring the original sellers and their real estate agents to keep the true prices confidential;
Grasso, Fitzgerald, Abrams and others fabricated inflated purchase contracts to make it look like they were buying the homes for hundreds of thousands – or even millions – of dollars more than their true prices;
Rizk and Robinson inflated appraisals of the homes to justify the inflated prices;
Schemers sent false loan application packages – many in the names of “straw borrowers” – to victim banks at the inflated prices; and
In-house escrow companies were used to conceal the true prices of the homes and distribute the excess loan proceeds received from the victim banks.
After purchasing the homes at their lower, true market values, many of the homes were “flipped” by the conspirators, meaning that after they bought homes they staged second sales at inflated prices that were reported to the victim banks to justify the inflated loans. According to the indictment, Lehman Brothers Bank alone was deceived into funding more than 80 such inflated loans from 2000 into 2003, resulting in tens of millions of dollars in losses.
The indictment details the purchase of a Beverly Hills home by Fitzgerald and Abrams in 2000 for $2 million, which they reported to a victim bank as $4.395 million after Rizk and Robinson supplied inflated appraisals. Babajian and Grasso, who had the listing of the home, manipulated the Multiple Listing Service database to falsely report that it was listed and sold at $4.495 million. A bogus loan application package went to Lehman Brothers Bank in the name of a straw borrower, and the bank unwittingly funded a loan of more than $2.8 million on the property – more than $800,000 more than the true $2 million purchase price. The conspirators split the excess loan proceeds from the fraud, including more than $46,000 in commissions to Babajian and Grasso.
The indictment returned today alleges that Babajian and Grasso profited by collecting hundreds of thousands of dollars in commissions and concealed payments. Rizk and Robinson allegedly profited by collecting hundreds of thousands of dollars in inflated appraisal fees.
Lehman Brothers Bank sued Babajian, Grasso, Rizk, Robinson, and others in federal court in Los Angeles in 2003. The federal court appointed David J. Pasternak as receiver to recover assets acquired with proceeds of the fraud. The receiver, as well as his attorneys and forensic accountants, have cooperated extensively with the government’s ongoing criminal investigation.
An indictment contains allegations that a defendant has committed a crime. Every defendant is presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty.
mortgage fraud
Post a Comment
The trackback URL for this entry is:
Trackbacks:
|
Some Sources require Registration.
Mortgage Scam Ends with Prison
The Morning Call
A judge didn't hold back when Shirley Matthews appeared before him Tuesday to be sentenced for stealing from a Monroe County man instead of helping him save his home from foreclosure, as she was hired to do.
Woman Gets Prison Time After Mortgage Scam Conviction
Pocono Record
A New Jersey woman will be spending two to five years in state prison after she was sentenced on Tuesday for promising to help homeowners avoid foreclosure and then keeping the money she was given for their mortgages.
2 Indicted in Mortgage Scam Face New Charges
Newsday.Com
Prosecutors add extra charges to two who are charged in LI mortgage fraud with county legislator, dominatrix and her husband
Untangling Mortgage Fraud in Chicago Condo Buildings
Chicago Public Radio
Why did so many units go into foreclosure all at once? In some cases, the reason can be traced to mortgage fraud.
No Contest Plea Entered in Real Estate Fraud Case
Northbay Business Journal
Juan Carlos Alcala of Windsor pleaded no contest to nineteen felony counts and admitted three special allegations for defrauding real estate investors, money laundering and elder fraud.
Bedford Woman Sentenced to a Year in Prison for Mortgage Fraud
Plain Dealer
Sharon Cox, 49, of Bedford, was sentenced today to a year in prison for mortgage fraud involving money laundering, theft and receiving stolen property from August 2008 through March.
CITIZEN JOURNALISM: Mortgage Fraud High in Area
Washington Times
According to the FBI, Virginia, Maryland and the District are among the top 10 jurisdictions experiencing mortgage fraud.
Former Vegas Resident Charged with Mortgage Fraud in Nevada
National Mortgage Professional Magazine
A former Las Vegas resident has been charged with federal conspiracy and fraud charges for his involvement in a Nevada mortgage fraud scheme involving straw buyers and falsified mortgage loan documents...
Missouri Man Sentenced for Mortgage Fraud
Belleville News Democrat
A suburban St. Louis mortgage company operator has been sentenced to more than 11 years in prison for a mortgage fraud scheme.
12-Year Prison Term in Mortgage Swindle
Washington Post
A Maryland woman who stole millions from Washington area homeowners trying to avoid foreclosure is a "vulture" whose case should serve as a warning to other con artists...
Previous Articles
|
Trial coverage provided by Anne Mitchell, Crazy Fish Realty.
F. Jeffrey Miller Update - October 20, 2009
A hearing was held in Topeka, Kansas in front of Judge Julie Robinson. Miller is currently being held pending his sentencing which is set for December 22nd, 2009 at 9:00 a.m.. Steve Vanatta and Hallie Irvin, Miller's codefendants, will be sentenced at that time also.
Several motions were heard this week. One was a motion for Miller to be released pending his sentencing. Miller's attorney, Jeff Morris, argued that the court had dismmissed with predjudice the matter involving Miller's purchase of a commercial lawnmower, violating the court ordered monitoring agreement. He also argued that Miller was not a flight risk and should be released. This motion was denied.
Another motion heard by Judge Robinson was that of an escrow account containing proceeds from the sale of Miller's forfeited assets. This account has a balance of $143,000. Attorney Morris argued that his firm was due $100,000 for work done in the Miller matter, to date. The government argued that his 'un-itemized fees' were 'exhorbitant'. The balance of the funds, Morris argued, should be released to the Miller family to help pay for mounting household expenses.
The government argued that the 'Asset Forfeiture Provision' applies down to 'the last penny' and that 'the rights of the victims to made whole are of paramount immportance' and that no routine household expenses like Visa bills, are allowed.
Attorney Morris argues that there is more than enough assets to satisfy the jury's judgement of $2.65 million dollars. The government argues that the estimated value of his assets are only $1.4 million.
The government also stated that Miller has been paid dividends from a company Miller has an ownership interest in; Boreflex. From July, 2008 to present, Miller has been paid $330,509.30 from Boreflex, unbeknownst to the court appointed monitor.
Present in the courtroom was Todd Earnshaw. Earnshaw was indicted along with Miller and others in what is commonly referred to as 'Miller I'. That trial is scheduled to begin on January 11, 2010 in Topeka, Kansas.
More Trial Coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|