Rachel Dollar is an attorney and Certified Mortgage Banker who handles fraud recovery litigation for lenders and secondary market investors nationwide. She is a nationally recognized speaker on the topic of mortgage fraud. Ms. Dollar is licensed to practice law in California and maintains offices in Santa Rosa, California. Email Ms. Dollar

Mortgage Fraud Blog is co-sponsored by Interthinx the leading provider of fraud services and solutions for the mortgage industry.

Dollar in the News

July 13, 2008 - Tampa Tribune
Close Door on Real Estate Fraud

May 31, 2008 - The Seattle Times
A Roundup of Real Estate Books

May 30, 2008 - Chicago Tribune
4 good reads

More Articles

Quick Links

Categories

Monthly Archives

Syndicate

You're welcome to post our feed on your site and provide your readers with the latest Headlines! Just select "Get Widget" below . . .
  

Subscribe in NewsGator Online

What's this?

Recent Posts

- Mortgage Fraud Scheme Leads to Prison Term for Houston Man
- Loan Officer Sentenced to 41 Months in Prison for Mortgage Fraud
- Phoenix Mortgage Broker Who Defrauded Seniors Gets Prison Term
- Jeffrey Miller Trial Begins in Topeka, Kansas
- Man Sentenced To 22 Years For Defrauding Church, Among Others
- 2 Indicted In Major Mortgage Fraud Scheme
- Mortgage Broker Sentenced to 12 Months Home Confinement
- 2 Guilty Convictions In NY Foreclosure Rescue Scam
- Guilty Plea In Multi-Million Dollar Mortgage Fraud And Telemarketing Schemes
- Fairfax Man Pleads Guilty in $33 Million Mortgage Fraud Case

Thursday, December 27, 2007

5 Indicted for Mortgage Fraud and Ponzi Schemes

Darryl G. Moore, 41, Solon, Ohio, Leon S. Heard, 72, Cleveland, Ohio and Steven I. Helfgott, 54, Cleveland, Ohio, were charged in eleven-count superceding indictment charging them with one count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud, wire fraud, and securities fraud; one count of securities fraud; one count of wire fraud; one count of money laundering; and one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering resulting from defrauding investors in an extensive “Ponzi” scheme. Moore and Heard, along with Mark C. Olds, Robert E. McNair, Avis D. Scott, Lee A. Granger, and Craig M. Duncan were also charged with a conspiracy to commit mortgage fraud, wire fraud, and interstate transportation of stolen property (ITSP) in connection with a scheme to defraud mortgage companies. Heard is also charged with bank fraud in connection with his false application and statements in obtaining his residence in Richmond Heights, Ohio.

Olds was previously convicted and was sentenced in a separate case to 92 months imprisonment in connection with a fraud committed against the Ohio Department of Education and the Internal Revenue Service.

The indictment charges that, as part of the scheme, Heard and Moore solicited investors to purchase securities, and other investments, in purportedly exclusive investments, such as so-called medium term notes, offshore investments with a Swiss bank, or currency trading, when, in fact, as the defendants well knew, there were no such investments. As part of the scheme, Moore and Heard falsely promised investors that they would earn a high rate of return on their principal, in many cases as high as 10 percent per month, and that they would receive monthly interest payments reflecting that rate of return on their investments. The indictment also charges that Moore and Heard also falsely led investors to believe that their investments were safe and secure, when, in fact, the defendants converted these funds to their own use, and the use of others, without making any investments. As part of the scheme, Moore, Heard, and Helfgott, paid some investors purported interest payments for a period of time so as to give the false impression that there was an actual investment, when, in truth and fact, as the defendants well knew, any interest payments came from other investors’ funds as part of a classic Ponzi scheme.

A Ponzi scheme is where one set of investors’ funds are used to pay supposed interest payments to other investors to encourage others to invest, or re-invest, and to keep investors from realizing that there are no investments and that they have been defrauded.

The indictment also charges that Moore and Heard, when it was necessary to add legitimacy to their fraudulent investments, at the outset of the scheme, represented to a few investors that their money would go to a hot shot broker named Steve for investment.  Moore and Heard told one investor that Steve worked for Merrill Lynch. Steven Thorn was the step-son of defendant Heard and, was a business associate of Moore and a former licensed broker who had been dismissed by Merrill Lynch.

The indictment charges that Heard and Helfgott, together with Moore, collected and deposited a few investors’ funds and forwarded those funds to Steve Thorn for his own personal use instead of investing in Thorn‘s “investments.” After the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filed an action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio and the Court ordered all of Thorn‘s bank accounts frozen, the defendants continued to funnel some of investors’ funds to Thorn so that Thorn could pay his expenses. As charged in the indictment, during the SEC case, Helfgott, an attorney, represented Heard, and attended hearings, knowing full well the allegations of the SEC and the ultimate finding of the Court that Thorn was committing securities fraud in selling fictitious securities as part of a “Ponzi” scheme, causing the loss of several million dollars to hundreds of investors. Following the Court’s freeze order, Moore and Heard continued to sell securities or investments that were the same as Thorn‘s investments and continued to lull investors who had not received their promised return of either principal or interest, without disclosing the SEC’s complaint or the Court’s Order.

Heard, Moore, McNair, Olds, Scott, Duncan and Granger were charged in a mortgage fraud conspiracy that enabled Moore, who had poor credit, to fraudulently sell his foreclosed residence at 6235 Arbor Glen, Solon, Ohio, and fraudulently purchase a more expensive residence at 6990 Woodlands Lane, Solon, Ohio. This conspiracy also enabled Olds, who also had poor credit, to obtain an interest in the Arbor Glen property through a nominee, and allowed all the defendants to enrich themselves. The indictment charged that McNair was a mortgage broker at Global Mortgage Co., Bedford Heights, Ohio, and that Scott was a real estate agent with Realty One, Pepper Pike, Ohio, and that Scott and Duncan were both employed by the Cuyahoga County Auditor’s Office. The indictment charged that Moore, in an effort to move out of his residence at Arbor Glen, sought a straw buyer with good credit to purchase his residence. In order to prevent the filing of additional liens against the Arbor Glen property, Moore and Heard filed a deed on the Arbor Glen property which purported to transfer the title to Moore‘s girlfriend. Heard prepared this deed even thought he was a disbarred attorney and not licensed to practice law.

Moore, McNair, Scott, and Olds arranged to bring in Granger as a straw buyer to purportedly purchase the Arbor Glen property. Granger had good credit but little in the way of assets or income, and in fact worked in a donut shop. Olds agreed to pay Granger $20,000 to complete the paperwork to purchase the Arbor Glen property. Moore set the sale price for Arbor Glen property at $545,000 so as to cover his mortgage and to take additional money from this transaction. In order to qualify for a 100 percent loan, and in order to finance that entire amount, Moore, McNair, Scott, Granger, and Olds falsified information as to Granger’s employment, income, and assets.

As a result of this false information, the mortgage company approved Granger’s loan for $545,000 to purchase the Arbor Glen property. These funds were wire transferred from the lender’s bank account in New York, New York, to the title company’s account at National City Bank, Cleveland, Ohio.

Simultaneous to the sale of the Arbor Glen property, Moore sought to purchase a more expensive residence at 6990 Woodlands Lane, Solon, Ohio. Moore offered to pay $725,000 for this property, well above the listed price of $647,500, so as to take additional money from this transaction when Moore was able to finance the purchase price. Moore had a poor credit history, so he and Scott sought out a straw buyer with good credit to purchase this property for Moore. Moore and Scott brought in Duncan to the offices of McNair so that Duncan could secure a loan for 100 percent value of the property. Moore and McNair falsified loan documents to inflate Duncan‘s income, assets, and length of employment. The defendant Moore paid Duncan $15,000 to complete this paperwork. The lending company approved Duncan‘s loans for $725,000 and wire transferring these funds from New York, New York, to Cleveland, Ohio. Moore directed $69,000 of the proceeds of his loan to purchase the Woodlands Lane property, through Duncan, to Olds so that Olds could make payments on the Arbor Glen property. Moore used the additional funds he received for the Woodlands Lane property to make his loan payments on that property.

The defendant Heard was separately charged with bank fraud in obtaining a mortgage loan to purchase his residence at 5214 Dickens Drive, Richmond Heights, Ohio, by submitting false employment and asset information to the bank.

   

Posted by Staff Reporter on 12/27/07 at 04:57 AM
Mortgage FraudOhio • Total comments: (3) (0) Trackbacks
  1. Every choice has a consequence.  Having been convicted in the early ‘90’s for a Ponzi scheme in the mid ‘80’s - I understand the consequences of choices made.  I spent time in federal prison for my dumb choices and know that the consequences follow long after the crime has been commited.  Perhaps these folks will learn as they face substantial time in prison.

    Posted by  on  12/29  at  07:19 AM
  2. And now to the post-conviction script:
    Heard, 72 magnificent years of age, is to deliver the following line:

    “Your honor, I apologize for my amoral and antiscoial behavior; it has ruined my life and that of my family. I beg the court, as an elderly remorseful man in poor health and lacking a moral compass, for leniency and compassion”.

    Judge:  Adios, amigo...30 years (read “life” in your case) in the slammer. Those who emulate you will now have second thoughts about comitting crime.

    Posted by  on  01/02  at  04:30 AM
  3. when is sentencing?

    Posted by  on  03/06  at  09:02 AM

Post a Comment

Name:

Email:

Location:

Smileys

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


The trackback URL for this entry is:

Trackbacks:




Advanced Search
Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz



TRIAL COVERAGE

Trial coverage provided by Anne Mitchell, Crazy Fish Realty.

 

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Synopsis of Day 2, Tuesday, November 18, 2008
Seating the Jury: The jury selection process was the order of business in day 2 of the USA v. Miller, et al. Court began at 1:00 p.m. The jurors had filled out a questionaire the previous day. The 56 person pool was narrowed to 42 people whose names were called by the court clerk. Of the initial 42 potential jurors, 27 are women, 15 are men. The remaining 14 sat in the observation area with me. The side of the courtroom is divided by an aisle. The Government is to the left of the aisle, along with the jury box. The defendants are on the right side of the aisle. The choice of which side to sit on can be assumed as 'support' of one side or the other. When the jury pool returned from a break, they all filled the left side of the observation area (where I sat) and almost begrudgingly filled the right side. For the better part of the afternoon, Judge Julie Robinson questioned the jurors about whether they had served on a jury before (including any civil matters against banks. Interestingly, this was the only question in which none of the potential jurors raised their hand), their prior criminal or civil history, among other things. Many of the jurors had previous jury experience. None had been forepersons on those juries. On a few occasions, Judge Robinson excused a juror due to answers given, such as financial hardship over the course of the trial from loss of income. One juror explained that he had a close relationship with Court prosecutors due to his sitting through a murder trial of his nephew. He was unsure whether he could be impartial. When the judge would excuse a juror, the clerk would then call the next name of the 14 remaining jury pool members. The 42 were then given a sheet and asked to stand and tell the Court about their education, job, marital and family status, hobbies, favorite TV shows, military history, and what clubs they belonged to. This took the longest part of the day as some of the members spoke at length. Mr. Vanatta remains in custody. He enters and leaves the courtroom with law enforcement officers. The two officers sit 3 feet away from Vanatta during the court proceedings. Mr. Vanatta clearly struggles to keep up with reviewing jury questionaires unlike the other defendants who are free pending the outcome of this trial. Hallie Irvin sits across from Mr. Vanatta. They continue to chat and exchange notes throughout the day. Samantha Harris has no conversation with her tablemate, F. Jeffrey Miller. Harris's attorney sits between the two. I am unsure whether the jurors have yet to identify Miller. He is better dressed than his lawyers and appears to be an attorney. There is a jury consultant in the court room. Aside from myself, he was the only non-jury pool member in the observation area of the courtroom. One of Miller's attorneys', Mr. Bradshaw, appears to be bothered by my presence in the courtroom. On Monday, he approached me in the courtroom. I told him I was simply there to observe the trial. On Tuesday, at one point Mr. Bradshaw 'squared his chair' towards me. Court is not in session today, Wednesday, November 19th. On Thursday, court will reconvene at 9 am. The attorneys will be allowed to ask further questions of the 42. In case of conflict, the remaining 14 are required to return to court as well. Then, the jury members will be selected. The opening statements are much anticipated. Judge Robinson says they will begin mid-morning on Thursday. -article by field reporter, Anne Mitchell, Crazy Fish Realty

More Trial Coverage

Today's News

Some Sources require Registration.

 

Suthers Cracks Down On Mortgage Fraud
Rocky Mountain News - Denver, CO
Suther’s office also indicted 10 individuals last March in an $11 million mortgage fraud ring involving 34 local properties...Several other investigations of mortgage fraud are ongoing.

Tech Roundup: Interthinx Tackles Conflict-of-Interest Fraud
HousingWire.com
Agoura Hills, Calif.-based Interthinx, Inc., a provider of risk mitigation and regulatory compliance tools, announced last week the addition of 21 new conflict-of-interest alerts within its FraudGUARD scoring system that identify possible collusion between loan participants.

Sex, Lies, and Subprime Mortgages
BusinessWeek
The sexual favors, whistleblower intimidation, and routine fraud behind the fiasco that has triggered the global financial crisis

More Residents Worry About Mortgage Fraud
Killeen Daily Herald - Killeen, TX
Special Agent Matthew Gravelle is an experienced fraud investigator in the Austin office of the FBI's San Antonio Division. During the last five years, mortgage fraud cases have piled up because of the collapsing mortgage market.

Anti-Mortgage Fraud Law Jams Up Realtors
Bizjournals.com - Charlotte, NC
The situation mainly affects short sales, where the asking price is lower than what the homeowner owes on the mortgage. If the homeowner is 60 days delinquent on payments, the home may be considered a “distressed property” under the state Mortgage Rescue Fraud Prevention Act that took effect July 1.

Hearing Delayed for 2 Mortgage Brokers Accused of Fraud
Las Vegas Sun - Las Vegas, NV
The preliminary hearing for two Henderson residents accused of mortgage fraud has been pushed back to March because of the defense attorney's involvement in the O.J. Simpson trial in October.

Foreclosure Fallout: Avoid Mortgage Scams, Fraudulent Schemes
KOLD-TV - Tucson, AZ
Thousands of people in Pima County are facing foreclosure...The U.S. Justice Department is cracking down on mortgage scams. So far this year, more than 400 people have been charged with fraud and other mortgage related crimes.

Task Force Will Fight Mortgage Fraud
St. Louis Post-Dispatch - MO
The U.S. attorney's office in St. Louis announced Wednesday that it was forming a task force to combat mortgage fraud. The effort is intended to "cast a broader net so that we can catch more of these criminals and put them behind bars," U.S. Attorney Catherine Hanaway said in a prepared statement.

Interthinx(R) Identifies Potential Collusion in Mortgage Applications
MarketWatch - USA
Interthinx(R) announces the addition of 21 new conflict-of-interest alerts within its proven FraudGUARD(R) scoring system that identify possible collusion between loan participants. The technology advancement will help lenders identify "non-arms length" mortgage transactions -- a serious indicator of potential mortgage fraud.

Viewpoint: Foreclosure Moratoriums, and Interpreting the Truth
Housing Wire - USA
If you read the headlines, you’d think Citigroup is putting a moratorium on most foreclosures nationwide...There’s just one problem: that’s not what Citigroup really said.

Previous Articles

What's Your Opinion?

Real Estate Blog Top SitesBlog Flux DirectoryBlog Directory & Search engineBlog Directory
Blogarama - The Blog DirectoryListed on BlogShares

© Copyright 2004-2007 Rachel M. Dollar

Legal Disclaimer.
The information and notices contained on Mortgage Fraud Blog are intended to summarize recent developments in mortgage fraud cases and mortgage banking matters nationwide. The posts on this site are presented as general research and information and are expressly not intended, and should not be regarded, as legal advice. Much of the information on this site concerns allegations made in civil lawsuits and in criminal indictments. All persons are presumed innocent until convicted of a crime. Readers who have particular questions about mortgage banking, mortgage fraud matters or who believe they require legal counsel should seek the advice of an attorney. The creators, editors and sponsors of Mortgage Fraud Blog do not intend to create a confidential relationship or an attorney-client relationship by communication via or arising from this site.

Real Estate Blog Top Sites Blog Flux Directory Blog Directory & Search engine Blog Directory
Blogarama - The Blog Directory Listed on BlogShares