Thursday, June 26, 2008
Arizona Announces Arrests In Operation Cash Back
From March 1 to June 18, 2008, Operation Cash Back in Arizona resulted in six mortgage fraud cases in which 36 defendants were charged. 30 arrests were made in mortgage fraud-related cases in the Tucson and Phoenix areas. The FBI estimates that approximately $100 million in losses were inflicted by the mortgage fraud schemes employed in these cases. In Arizona, Operation Cash Back represents the collaborative efforts of the U.S. Attorney’s Office, FBI, Internal Revenue Service-Criminal Investigation Division, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of the Inspector General, U.S. Marshals Service, Arizona Department of Financial Institutions, and the Scottsdale Police Department.
United States Attorney Diane J. Humetewa stated that “The individuals charged in these Arizona indictments are responsible for more than $100 million dollars in fraudulently obtained loans in Arizona. The investigation & prosecution of mortgage fraud is a top law enforcement priority & we are jointly committed to aggressively pursuing those involved in these crimes.”
“Over the last few years with the fluctuation in Arizona’s real estate market, too many individuals associated with this industry have exploited this market for their own personal gain. Innocent homeowners and businesses all across Arizona are paying a steep price for the selfish and illegal acts of others who attempt to capitalize on this market,” stated John E. Lewis, Special Agent in Charge, FBI Phoenix. “Mortgage Fraud is similar to other crimes which involve criminals exploiting innocent people and businesses for their own illegitimate gain. The FBI is dedicated to working with our law enforcement partners to combat this problem facing the lawful citizens of our state.” Operation Cash Back in Arizona is part of the nationwide Operation Malicious Mortgage fraud law enforcement effort. Nationally the Operation resulted in 144 mortgage fraud cases in which 406 defendants were charged. 60 arrests were made in mortgage fraud-related cases in 15 districts.
Nationally, the FBI estimates that approximately $1 billion in losses were inflicted by the mortgage fraud schemes. Mortgage frauds employ a variety of tactics including misrepresentations, deceit and other criminal abuses to fund, purchase or insure mortgage loans. Operation Malicious Mortgage addresses primarily three types of mortgage fraud schemes: lending fraud, foreclosure rescue scams and mortgage-related bankruptcy schemes. Lending fraud frequently involves multiple loan transactions in which industry professionals construct mortgage transactions based on gross fraudulent misrepresentations about the borrower’s financial status, such as overstating the borrower’s income or assets, using false or fictitious employment records or inflating property values. Foreclosure rescue scams involve criminals who target legitimate homeowners in dire financial circumstances and
fraudulently collect fees for foreclosure prevention services or obtain ownership interests in residential properties. Both of these fraudulent mortgage schemes may be furthered by filing bankruptcy petitions that automatically stay foreclosure.
Dawn Mertz, Assistant Special Agent in Charge, Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation Division stated that “Mortgage fraud adds to the underground economy that erodes the integrity of our tax system and threatens the financial health of our communities. IRS CI is committed to pursuing individuals who commit these types of crimes.”
Kenneth M. Donohue, Inspector General of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), stated, “Today is an important milestone in a combined effort by law enforcement and the U.S. Attorneys Office against mortgage fraud. The Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) was enacted to protect all parties involved in real estate transactions, to including the lenders. These cases involve individual homebuyers and real estate professionals, driven by greed, who falsified closing documents that diverted “cash” to the buyers. Mortgage fraud and white collar crimes - whether aimed at the lender or the borrower - strike at the economic heart of the American system. To the extent that we can uncover and prosecute these activities, it’s to everyone’s benefit. Accordingly, I am happy for the HUD Office of Inspector General to join the U.S. Attorney’s Office in heralding this successful effort.”
“Mortgage fraud is a serious problem in Arizona and we are committed to working with city, state and federal agencies to protect Arizona residents and lenders. I applaud the hard work of the U.S. Attorney’s office, law enforcement and our state agency investigators,” stated Felecia Rotellini, Superintendent, Arizona Department of Financial Institutions. “We will continue to cooperate in the investigations and to pursue administrative actions against our licensees to send the message that mortgage fraud will not be tolerated in Arizona.”
“This case sends an important message about maintaining high standards for the mortgage industry,” stated Alan Rodbell, Chief of the Scottsdale Police Department. “It’s clear how these types of crimes can affect all levels of the community, from the financial industry to neighborhoods and individual homeowners. We are pleased to be part of this collaborative effort.”
An indictment is not evidence of guilt. All persons charged with a crime are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The prosecution is being handled by Kevin Rapp, Assistant U.S. Attorney, District of Arizona, Phoenix.
mortgage fraud
Post a Comment
The trackback URL for this entry is:
Trackbacks:
|
Some Sources require Registration.
Mortgage Fraud Risk Index Jumps 11 Percent, According to Verisk Analytics Subsidiary Interthinx
CNNMoney.com
The report...indicates that the overall Interthinx Mortgage Fraud Risk Index surged more than 11 percent from the previous quarter...
Mortgage Fraud Case Appears Headed to Jury in Jackson County Circuit Court
The Jackson Citizen Patriot - MLive.com
The prosecution and defense rested Thursday in the mortgage fraud cases against Teresa Marie WIlson and Angelo Surveo Williams.
Wyoming Woman Charged with Mortgage Fraud After Allegedly Stealing Sister's Identity
MLive.com
A Wyoming woman is facing felony charges accusing her of stealing her sister's identity to obtain a mortgage...then defaulting on that mortgage, leaving taxpayers on the hook.
U.S. Attorney Targets White-Collar Crime
Wall Street Journal
In San Francisco, Mr. Russoniello said he is trying to crack down on cases like mortgage fraud, though he doesn't have the budget to hire additional white-collar prosecutors.
Arrests Made in Orlando Mortgage Fraud Roundup
MyFoxOrlando.com
During the real estate boom two years ago, some units were going for a half million dollars. Now some are short selling for just 50 grand.
10 Accused of Mortgage Fraud at PR Coastal Resort
Forbes
A developer and nine other people, including a former salsa singer, have been charged in an alleged $14 million mortgage fraud in Puerto Rico...
Strodtman Jury Selected in Mortgage Fraud Trial
Greeley Tribune
Attorneys will deliver opening statements this morning in the trial of Mark Strodtman, who is accused of bilking homeowners in a mortgage scheme years ago.
FHA Digging Out After Loans Sour
Wall Street Journal
Most banks rejected Ms. DeForte because her debt level was too high and her credit score too low. But Lend America put Ms. DeForte into a $402,000 loan backed by the Federal Housing Administration...
Mortgage Fraud Probe Nets 105 Across State
Bradenton Herald
At least one local man is among 105 people arrested across the state following a nine-month investigation into organized mortgage fraud.
Mortgage Fraud Increases
MortgageRates.co.nz
The number of frauds involving professional advisors, such as accountants and lawyers, has increased from two to four since March 2008.
Previous Articles
|
Trial coverage provided by Anne Mitchell, Crazy Fish Realty.
F. Jeffrey Miller Update - October 20, 2009
A hearing was held in Topeka, Kansas in front of Judge Julie Robinson. Miller is currently being held pending his sentencing which is set for December 22nd, 2009 at 9:00 a.m.. Steve Vanatta and Hallie Irvin, Miller's codefendants, will be sentenced at that time also.
Several motions were heard this week. One was a motion for Miller to be released pending his sentencing. Miller's attorney, Jeff Morris, argued that the court had dismmissed with predjudice the matter involving Miller's purchase of a commercial lawnmower, violating the court ordered monitoring agreement. He also argued that Miller was not a flight risk and should be released. This motion was denied.
Another motion heard by Judge Robinson was that of an escrow account containing proceeds from the sale of Miller's forfeited assets. This account has a balance of $143,000. Attorney Morris argued that his firm was due $100,000 for work done in the Miller matter, to date. The government argued that his 'un-itemized fees' were 'exhorbitant'. The balance of the funds, Morris argued, should be released to the Miller family to help pay for mounting household expenses.
The government argued that the 'Asset Forfeiture Provision' applies down to 'the last penny' and that 'the rights of the victims to made whole are of paramount immportance' and that no routine household expenses like Visa bills, are allowed.
Attorney Morris argues that there is more than enough assets to satisfy the jury's judgement of $2.65 million dollars. The government argues that the estimated value of his assets are only $1.4 million.
The government also stated that Miller has been paid dividends from a company Miller has an ownership interest in; Boreflex. From July, 2008 to present, Miller has been paid $330,509.30 from Boreflex, unbeknownst to the court appointed monitor.
Present in the courtroom was Todd Earnshaw. Earnshaw was indicted along with Miller and others in what is commonly referred to as 'Miller I'. That trial is scheduled to begin on January 11, 2010 in Topeka, Kansas.
More Trial Coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|