Monday, April 21, 2008
Ex Mayor Sharpe Convicted of Flipping
Sharpe James was convicted by a Newark, New Jersey, jury on all corruption charges against him in connection with a scheme that enabled his girlfriend, Tamika Riley, to fraudulently obtain steeply discounted city-owned land and resell it for hundreds of thousands of dollars in profits. The jury began deliberating midday on Wednesday, April 9. Jurors deliberated another four full days before announcing early this morning they had reached a verdict.
Riley was convicted with James on the same five charges: three counts of mail fraud related to the sale of the city lots to Riley, one count of fraud involving a local government receiving federal funds, and one count of conspiracy to defraud the public of James‘ honest services.
The prosecution was built around the sale to Riley of municipally-owned properties in Newark, New Jersey. The properties, according to evidence and testimony, were steered to Riley by James, who had a long-running romantic relationship with her. Riley paid only $46,000 for a total of nine properties, and then quickly resold, or “flipped” the properties for more than $600,000.
Evidence at trial revealed that James used his influence and power as both mayor and as a state senator to manipulate and control a city program designed to redevelop run-down properties in the city. The program was intended to enable experienced, financially sound and qualified developers to buy blighted lots and houses at substantially less than market rates on the condition that they rehabilitate the properties before re-selling them at market prices. With James‘s help, Riley acquired the properties at cut-rate prices and resold them without any rehabilitation.
Riley had no real estate or construction experience and did not possess the financial wherewithal or backing required to participate in the program. She was, in fact, the owner of a failed Newark clothing store and had operated an entertainment and public relations firm that reported no income or assets on tax returns in 1999 or 2000, the years before she started flipping Newark properties.
According to trial testimony, throughout the period of their relationship and the property transactions benefitting Riley, James and Riley traveled and socialized together, shared hotel rooms and stayed in fine resorts, among other things. Testimony also revealed that James once directed his security personnel to purchase and install an air-conditioner in Riley‘s Jersey City apartment. Riley also donated several times to James’ political campaigns.
The jury also convicted Riley, of Jersey City, on other charges in the 13-count Indictment that named her only. Those additional convictions are: three counts of mail fraud for Riley‘s fraudulent receipt of housing rental assistance for which she was not qualified; two counts of tax fraud for failing to report the income she received from the sale of the Newark, New Jersey properties; one count of corporate tax fraud, and one count of tax evasion.
Under the advisory U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, which a sentencing judge must consult, James and Riley face a prison sentence of between five and 12 years in prison. The Sentencing Guidelines, however, are advisory only, and U.S. District Judge William J. Martini will have discretion in imposing sentence within or outside of that range.
Judge Martini scheduled sentencing for James and Riley for July 29. “Sharpe James was among the most powerful and well-known political figures in New Jersey history, but he was not above the law. Justice has finally been done,” Christie said.
“There were deep passions on either side of this case. But what everyone should now recognize is that 12 ordinary citizens from New Jersey heard the evidence and independently found what we’ve said all along-that Sharpe James is guilty of stealing from Newark and its citizens and of using Newark resources for his personal benefit.”
James remains under indictment on another set of charges related to his alleged fraudulent use of city credit cards to fund lavish trips with female companions, including Riley, and other personal expenses. Judge Martini, in motions decided before the trial of James and Riley, severed that set of charges from the government’s original Indictment, necessitating two trials for James and one for Riley. Christie said he will consult within the office, with federal investigative agencies and with state Attorney General Anne Milgram before deciding how to proceed on those charges.
mortgage fraud
Post a Comment
The trackback URL for this entry is:
Trackbacks:
|
Some Sources require Registration.
Mortgage Fraud Risk Index Jumps 11 Percent, According to Verisk Analytics Subsidiary Interthinx
CNNMoney.com
The report...indicates that the overall Interthinx Mortgage Fraud Risk Index surged more than 11 percent from the previous quarter...
Mortgage Fraud Case Appears Headed to Jury in Jackson County Circuit Court
The Jackson Citizen Patriot - MLive.com
The prosecution and defense rested Thursday in the mortgage fraud cases against Teresa Marie WIlson and Angelo Surveo Williams.
Wyoming Woman Charged with Mortgage Fraud After Allegedly Stealing Sister's Identity
MLive.com
A Wyoming woman is facing felony charges accusing her of stealing her sister's identity to obtain a mortgage...then defaulting on that mortgage, leaving taxpayers on the hook.
U.S. Attorney Targets White-Collar Crime
Wall Street Journal
In San Francisco, Mr. Russoniello said he is trying to crack down on cases like mortgage fraud, though he doesn't have the budget to hire additional white-collar prosecutors.
Arrests Made in Orlando Mortgage Fraud Roundup
MyFoxOrlando.com
During the real estate boom two years ago, some units were going for a half million dollars. Now some are short selling for just 50 grand.
10 Accused of Mortgage Fraud at PR Coastal Resort
Forbes
A developer and nine other people, including a former salsa singer, have been charged in an alleged $14 million mortgage fraud in Puerto Rico...
Strodtman Jury Selected in Mortgage Fraud Trial
Greeley Tribune
Attorneys will deliver opening statements this morning in the trial of Mark Strodtman, who is accused of bilking homeowners in a mortgage scheme years ago.
FHA Digging Out After Loans Sour
Wall Street Journal
Most banks rejected Ms. DeForte because her debt level was too high and her credit score too low. But Lend America put Ms. DeForte into a $402,000 loan backed by the Federal Housing Administration...
Mortgage Fraud Probe Nets 105 Across State
Bradenton Herald
At least one local man is among 105 people arrested across the state following a nine-month investigation into organized mortgage fraud.
Mortgage Fraud Increases
MortgageRates.co.nz
The number of frauds involving professional advisors, such as accountants and lawyers, has increased from two to four since March 2008.
Previous Articles
|
Trial coverage provided by Anne Mitchell, Crazy Fish Realty.
F. Jeffrey Miller Update - October 20, 2009
A hearing was held in Topeka, Kansas in front of Judge Julie Robinson. Miller is currently being held pending his sentencing which is set for December 22nd, 2009 at 9:00 a.m.. Steve Vanatta and Hallie Irvin, Miller's codefendants, will be sentenced at that time also.
Several motions were heard this week. One was a motion for Miller to be released pending his sentencing. Miller's attorney, Jeff Morris, argued that the court had dismmissed with predjudice the matter involving Miller's purchase of a commercial lawnmower, violating the court ordered monitoring agreement. He also argued that Miller was not a flight risk and should be released. This motion was denied.
Another motion heard by Judge Robinson was that of an escrow account containing proceeds from the sale of Miller's forfeited assets. This account has a balance of $143,000. Attorney Morris argued that his firm was due $100,000 for work done in the Miller matter, to date. The government argued that his 'un-itemized fees' were 'exhorbitant'. The balance of the funds, Morris argued, should be released to the Miller family to help pay for mounting household expenses.
The government argued that the 'Asset Forfeiture Provision' applies down to 'the last penny' and that 'the rights of the victims to made whole are of paramount immportance' and that no routine household expenses like Visa bills, are allowed.
Attorney Morris argues that there is more than enough assets to satisfy the jury's judgement of $2.65 million dollars. The government argues that the estimated value of his assets are only $1.4 million.
The government also stated that Miller has been paid dividends from a company Miller has an ownership interest in; Boreflex. From July, 2008 to present, Miller has been paid $330,509.30 from Boreflex, unbeknownst to the court appointed monitor.
Present in the courtroom was Todd Earnshaw. Earnshaw was indicted along with Miller and others in what is commonly referred to as 'Miller I'. That trial is scheduled to begin on January 11, 2010 in Topeka, Kansas.
More Trial Coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|