Friday, September 28, 2007
Exonerated Broker Attempts to Sue US Attorney & FBI
Torina Collis filed suit against the United States of America, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, FBI Special Agent Desiree Skinner Smith and Assistant United States Attorney Gina Simms seeking damages for allegedly false and malicious testimony about her provided by Smith to a grand jury, which resulted in her indictment. Collis alleged that the actions by the various defendants amounted to violations of her Fourth Amendment right to be “free from seizure without probable cause” and her Fifth Amendment Due Process rights.
Collis was employed with mortgage broker WMS, Inc. from December 1996 through December 1999. On April 5, 2000, and again on September 20, 2000, a grand jury issued subpoenas to WMS in furtherance of a mortgage fraud investigation. Assistant Attorney Us Attorney Simms and FBI Special Agent Smith interviewed Collis on March 14, 2001 when she no longer worked for WMS. The notes from this interview were presented to the Court at the March 23, 2007 hearing. Collis informed SA Smith and AUSA Simms that:
Collis was told to audit files, which consisted of purging the files, or throwing out information in the files. For files that were missing information that was supposed to be in them, she was told by [a co-defendant] to make up the documents. Such documents included good faith estimates. She was also told to destroy documents such as pay stubs, W-2’s, bank statements and sales contracts (all documents provided by the buyer) by [co-defendant]. She was told to keep the typed application, brokers agreement, handwritten application, credit report, appraisal disclosure, request for transcript of tax form and all the disclosures. [Co-defendant] said they were purging the files because the files were so large and they wanted to thin them. Collis also had some involvement in making loans to buyers. She was told by [codefendant] not to fill out the details of transaction portion of the loan application because one is not supposed to be both the processor and the originator on a loan, however Collis did both.
Over two years later, on May 28, 2003, AUSA Simms presented evidence to a grand jury that included the testimony of SA Smith. Based on the evidence presented, which consisted of SA Smith‘s testimony as well as the testimony of other witnesses presented to it over the number of occasions on which it met, the grand jury indicted Collis on June 25, 2004. She was subsequently arrested by HUD agents, handcuffed and taken into custody. Collis was scheduled to go to trial on November 30, 2004, but the Government moved to dismiss the indictment and superseding indictment as to Collis on November 24, 2004. The Court approved the request on November 29, 2004.
After dismissal of charges, Collis brought suit against SA Smith and the Assistant United States Attorney seeking damages for presentation of allegedly false and malicious testimony to grand jury. At a March 23, 2007 hearing, the Plaintiff presented to the Court without objection a brief excerpt of the grand jury transcript for May 28, 2003 that was alleged to be false and malicious. The brief excerpt produced for the Court contains the following conversation:
A JUROR: Torina Collis. Did you tell us that she said that the files had been purged or that ...
THE WITNESS: No, she told us herself that they had been purged.
A JUROR: And these were files that were under subpoena?
THE WITNESS: Correct.
A JUROR: Is that--isn’t that against the law?
MS. SIMMS: Well, if you want to ask this witness a question, a factual question she can answer.
A JUROR: Well, no, that’s okay. I just wanted to make sure they were under subpoena.
THE WITNESS: Mm-hmm.
The Court was not provided with, and the Plaintiff did not presented, either at the hearing or in its papers, any additional testimony by SA Smith. However, it is the above-quoted colloquy, between a grand juror and Smith that formed the basis for Collis‘ complaint.
The FBI and AUSA moved to dismiss Plaintiff’s claim. The District Court granted their motion to dismiss the complaint holding that:
(1) the prosecutor was entitled to absolute immunity;
(2) the target’s Fifth Amendment right to due process was not violated by federal agent’s testimony before grand jury;
(3) the agent did not violate target’s Fourth Amendment rights to be “free from seizure without probable cause” by allegedly presenting “false, malicious testimony” to the grand jury; and
(4) the agent was entitled to absolute immunity.
Collis‘ complaint was therefore dismissed in totality.
mortgage fraud
Good job on the KGET piece!!
Posted by
bakersfieldbubble on 09/30 at 08:18 PM
To whom this may concern:
I have been going through identity theft for a few years, one of the worse cases. This public figure is in an unrealistic state of mind. This person told people that I worked forher when I never even met this person. Swindeled her way into my family companies and tried to take over my companies, that my family left me in a will. And she is still stealing money out of my accounts. I have filed a lawsuit, but i do not know why public officials keep letting her the hook. I want her arrested, and to reimburst me for everything she stole, and my sisters were also involved. What else more can i do? Can I go above the Supreme court? Because I want justice now!
Posted by on 06/24 at 05:34 AM
This is an incredible story in the sense that these individuals in making their carriers can utterly destroy someones life just to make a name for themselves, and have immunity although guilty of fraud and false testimony in a federal court. They might as well have bombed a market place or crashed a plain into a building because in my opinion these individuals are terrorist to the American people. The only thing Ms Collins is guilty of is not knowing how to defend herself against these two terrorist pretending to be Americans.
Posted by on 08/06 at 08:01 AM
Loan Purging! Is this real? Is this possible? I know a lot of families who have been victims of fraud by these companies professing to purge people loans from the banks. I don’t see how this is possible. This violates several statues of the California Foreclosure Consultants law mainly because these professed attorneys are actually taking an equity share in the property after the fact is this legal? Where can I find more information on the companies that have been such down
Posted by on 08/06 at 08:07 AM
Going to help her out…
Posted by on 09/26 at 01:30 PM
I am currently under a civil lawsuit with SunTrust Mortgage, Inc and I am a victim of such mortgage fraud. I have reported this in January of 2008 to the FBI, reporting not the bank but the builder of fraud. This came after the bank called my loan in Dec of 2007 during construction and never in default. When I called the the Bank in Jan of 2008 the bank allowed a construction inspection and disbursed funds from the inspection, even thought they had called the loan due, stated that I could finish the properties and then three weeks later called the loan due again. This was a construction to perm loan from Aug. 2005 and was not to become a mortage until the property obtained a Certificate of Occupancy, although the SunTrust has been running the Mortgage immediately with nondisclosure.
I had applied for a construction loan that was suppose to be for a nine month period, extended by the bank for well over 30 months, without a licensed contractor, approved plains, building permits, and all the construction procedeeds being disbursed by a frauduletn POA all under a limited POA for the LLC, who in fact was the builder and the owner of the construction company, and was not at license contractor and had throught this, what I thought was a limited POA, when in fact the notrary signed an affidavit of a Durable Power of Attorney on a limited power of attorney.
Tracey Grifin, Notary for Florida Title, that was directly disbursed the construction proceeds with out my knowledge.we had paid the interest of 9% on a million dollars for over thirty months. I still do not have certificate of occupancy, hundreds of thousands of dollars in liens, being foreclosed upon by the bank for a residential mortgage, when in fact it was a commercial loan, I have had to file bankruptcy, a voluntary chapter 7 under protection form 11 USC 362b and the banks have refiled against my business partners on the usury loans and continue with malice to move against us.
The the properties have been after my BK7 retitled in my name after the bk7, discharged and closed although that estate is under 11 USC 362 b of sec fraud, automatic stay for protection.
We have found out that in fact these were executed from and investment firm from an SEC regulated and transferred to an FDIC regulated when they were told not to because of the mezzanine level financing and underwriting the was insured by UUC Plus that taught Insurance 100 law 0.
This UCC Plus was underwritten by Old Republic insurance the reinsurance was that is AIG. There is an Owners Policy, Loan Policy, Lenders Policy 101792, simultaneous closing insurance are know being denied.
Posted by on 09/26 at 02:20 PM
Post a Comment
The trackback URL for this entry is:
Trackbacks:
|
Some Sources require Registration.
Mortgage Fraud Risk Index Jumps 11 Percent, According to Verisk Analytics Subsidiary Interthinx
CNNMoney.com
The report...indicates that the overall Interthinx Mortgage Fraud Risk Index surged more than 11 percent from the previous quarter...
Mortgage Fraud Case Appears Headed to Jury in Jackson County Circuit Court
The Jackson Citizen Patriot - MLive.com
The prosecution and defense rested Thursday in the mortgage fraud cases against Teresa Marie WIlson and Angelo Surveo Williams.
Wyoming Woman Charged with Mortgage Fraud After Allegedly Stealing Sister's Identity
MLive.com
A Wyoming woman is facing felony charges accusing her of stealing her sister's identity to obtain a mortgage...then defaulting on that mortgage, leaving taxpayers on the hook.
U.S. Attorney Targets White-Collar Crime
Wall Street Journal
In San Francisco, Mr. Russoniello said he is trying to crack down on cases like mortgage fraud, though he doesn't have the budget to hire additional white-collar prosecutors.
Arrests Made in Orlando Mortgage Fraud Roundup
MyFoxOrlando.com
During the real estate boom two years ago, some units were going for a half million dollars. Now some are short selling for just 50 grand.
10 Accused of Mortgage Fraud at PR Coastal Resort
Forbes
A developer and nine other people, including a former salsa singer, have been charged in an alleged $14 million mortgage fraud in Puerto Rico...
Strodtman Jury Selected in Mortgage Fraud Trial
Greeley Tribune
Attorneys will deliver opening statements this morning in the trial of Mark Strodtman, who is accused of bilking homeowners in a mortgage scheme years ago.
FHA Digging Out After Loans Sour
Wall Street Journal
Most banks rejected Ms. DeForte because her debt level was too high and her credit score too low. But Lend America put Ms. DeForte into a $402,000 loan backed by the Federal Housing Administration...
Mortgage Fraud Probe Nets 105 Across State
Bradenton Herald
At least one local man is among 105 people arrested across the state following a nine-month investigation into organized mortgage fraud.
Mortgage Fraud Increases
MortgageRates.co.nz
The number of frauds involving professional advisors, such as accountants and lawyers, has increased from two to four since March 2008.
Previous Articles
|
Trial coverage provided by Anne Mitchell, Crazy Fish Realty.
F. Jeffrey Miller Update - October 20, 2009
A hearing was held in Topeka, Kansas in front of Judge Julie Robinson. Miller is currently being held pending his sentencing which is set for December 22nd, 2009 at 9:00 a.m.. Steve Vanatta and Hallie Irvin, Miller's codefendants, will be sentenced at that time also.
Several motions were heard this week. One was a motion for Miller to be released pending his sentencing. Miller's attorney, Jeff Morris, argued that the court had dismmissed with predjudice the matter involving Miller's purchase of a commercial lawnmower, violating the court ordered monitoring agreement. He also argued that Miller was not a flight risk and should be released. This motion was denied.
Another motion heard by Judge Robinson was that of an escrow account containing proceeds from the sale of Miller's forfeited assets. This account has a balance of $143,000. Attorney Morris argued that his firm was due $100,000 for work done in the Miller matter, to date. The government argued that his 'un-itemized fees' were 'exhorbitant'. The balance of the funds, Morris argued, should be released to the Miller family to help pay for mounting household expenses.
The government argued that the 'Asset Forfeiture Provision' applies down to 'the last penny' and that 'the rights of the victims to made whole are of paramount immportance' and that no routine household expenses like Visa bills, are allowed.
Attorney Morris argues that there is more than enough assets to satisfy the jury's judgement of $2.65 million dollars. The government argues that the estimated value of his assets are only $1.4 million.
The government also stated that Miller has been paid dividends from a company Miller has an ownership interest in; Boreflex. From July, 2008 to present, Miller has been paid $330,509.30 from Boreflex, unbeknownst to the court appointed monitor.
Present in the courtroom was Todd Earnshaw. Earnshaw was indicted along with Miller and others in what is commonly referred to as 'Miller I'. That trial is scheduled to begin on January 11, 2010 in Topeka, Kansas.
More Trial Coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|