Monday, December 15, 2008
5 Charged In Mortgage Fraud Scheme
A fifteen count federal grand jury indictment in Cleveland, Ohio, has been unsealed against:
Paul A. Lesniak, 40, Strongsville, Ohio,
Uri Gofman, 36, Beachwood, Ohio,
Grennadiy Simkhovich, 51, Highland Heights, Ohio,
Dave Pirichy, 38, Burton, Ohio; and
Howard Sieferd, Jr., 57, Euclid, Ohio.
The defendants are charged for their roles in a mortgage fraud scheme; one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, and eighteen counts of wire fraud against all defendants.
The indictment alleges that during the period from about August 2005 through September 2005, Paul A. Lesniak, Uri Gofman, Grennadiy Simkhovich, Dave Pirichy and Howard Sieferd, Jr. conspired to purchase eighteen properties in the Cleveland area for almost $2 million, of which thirteen properties for $1.2 million were all purchased on or about August 16, 2005. The indictment further alleges that as part of their conspiracy, defendant Paul A. Lesniak completed and submitted false and fraudulent loan applications with the assistance of defendant Dave Pirichy, a mortgage broker for Central National Mortgage, LLC, which falsified his employment, overstated his income, overstated his assets, falsified his intent to occupy the property and concealed the source of the down-payment funds, which were in fact provided by defendants Uri Gofman and Grennadiy Simkhovich through their company, Real Asset Fund, LLC, in order to obtain the financing to purchase the eighteen properties. The indictment alleges that defendant Howard Sieferd, Jr., a licensed title agent through the State of Ohio employed by Family Title Service, Inc., served as the title agent on the properties and conspired with defendants Uri Gofman and Grennadiy Simkhovich to allow the mortgage loan proceeds to be fraudulently and improperly distributed. The indictment alleges that the defendants did all of this in order to deceive and defraud Long Beach Mortgage Company, Argent Mortgage Company, LLC and Mortgage IT, Inc. into funding the mortgage loans.
If convicted, the defendants’ sentences will be determined by the Court after review of factors unique to this case, including the defendants’ prior criminal records, if any, each defendant’s role in the offense, and the characteristics of the violation. In all cases the sentences will not exceed the statutory maximum and in most cases it will be less than the maximum.
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Mark S. Bennett, following an investigation by the Cleveland Division of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), and in conjunction with the Cuyahoga County Mortgage Fraud Task Force.
An indictment is only a charge and is not evidence of guilt. Defendants are entitled to a fair trial in which it will be the government’s burden to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
mortgage fraud
Post a Comment
The trackback URL for this entry is:
Trackbacks:
|
Some Sources require Registration.
Mortgage Scam Ends with Prison
The Morning Call
A judge didn't hold back when Shirley Matthews appeared before him Tuesday to be sentenced for stealing from a Monroe County man instead of helping him save his home from foreclosure, as she was hired to do.
Woman Gets Prison Time After Mortgage Scam Conviction
Pocono Record
A New Jersey woman will be spending two to five years in state prison after she was sentenced on Tuesday for promising to help homeowners avoid foreclosure and then keeping the money she was given for their mortgages.
2 Indicted in Mortgage Scam Face New Charges
Newsday.Com
Prosecutors add extra charges to two who are charged in LI mortgage fraud with county legislator, dominatrix and her husband
Untangling Mortgage Fraud in Chicago Condo Buildings
Chicago Public Radio
Why did so many units go into foreclosure all at once? In some cases, the reason can be traced to mortgage fraud.
No Contest Plea Entered in Real Estate Fraud Case
Northbay Business Journal
Juan Carlos Alcala of Windsor pleaded no contest to nineteen felony counts and admitted three special allegations for defrauding real estate investors, money laundering and elder fraud.
Bedford Woman Sentenced to a Year in Prison for Mortgage Fraud
Plain Dealer
Sharon Cox, 49, of Bedford, was sentenced today to a year in prison for mortgage fraud involving money laundering, theft and receiving stolen property from August 2008 through March.
CITIZEN JOURNALISM: Mortgage Fraud High in Area
Washington Times
According to the FBI, Virginia, Maryland and the District are among the top 10 jurisdictions experiencing mortgage fraud.
Former Vegas Resident Charged with Mortgage Fraud in Nevada
National Mortgage Professional Magazine
A former Las Vegas resident has been charged with federal conspiracy and fraud charges for his involvement in a Nevada mortgage fraud scheme involving straw buyers and falsified mortgage loan documents...
Missouri Man Sentenced for Mortgage Fraud
Belleville News Democrat
A suburban St. Louis mortgage company operator has been sentenced to more than 11 years in prison for a mortgage fraud scheme.
12-Year Prison Term in Mortgage Swindle
Washington Post
A Maryland woman who stole millions from Washington area homeowners trying to avoid foreclosure is a "vulture" whose case should serve as a warning to other con artists...
Previous Articles
|
Trial coverage provided by Anne Mitchell, Crazy Fish Realty.
F. Jeffrey Miller Update - October 20, 2009
A hearing was held in Topeka, Kansas in front of Judge Julie Robinson. Miller is currently being held pending his sentencing which is set for December 22nd, 2009 at 9:00 a.m.. Steve Vanatta and Hallie Irvin, Miller's codefendants, will be sentenced at that time also.
Several motions were heard this week. One was a motion for Miller to be released pending his sentencing. Miller's attorney, Jeff Morris, argued that the court had dismmissed with predjudice the matter involving Miller's purchase of a commercial lawnmower, violating the court ordered monitoring agreement. He also argued that Miller was not a flight risk and should be released. This motion was denied.
Another motion heard by Judge Robinson was that of an escrow account containing proceeds from the sale of Miller's forfeited assets. This account has a balance of $143,000. Attorney Morris argued that his firm was due $100,000 for work done in the Miller matter, to date. The government argued that his 'un-itemized fees' were 'exhorbitant'. The balance of the funds, Morris argued, should be released to the Miller family to help pay for mounting household expenses.
The government argued that the 'Asset Forfeiture Provision' applies down to 'the last penny' and that 'the rights of the victims to made whole are of paramount immportance' and that no routine household expenses like Visa bills, are allowed.
Attorney Morris argues that there is more than enough assets to satisfy the jury's judgement of $2.65 million dollars. The government argues that the estimated value of his assets are only $1.4 million.
The government also stated that Miller has been paid dividends from a company Miller has an ownership interest in; Boreflex. From July, 2008 to present, Miller has been paid $330,509.30 from Boreflex, unbeknownst to the court appointed monitor.
Present in the courtroom was Todd Earnshaw. Earnshaw was indicted along with Miller and others in what is commonly referred to as 'Miller I'. That trial is scheduled to begin on January 11, 2010 in Topeka, Kansas.
More Trial Coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|