Thursday, June 26, 2008
Florida Man Indicted For Inflating Property Values
Juan Carlos Gonzalez, 50, Jacksonville, Florida, was indicted on charges of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and bank fraud. The maximum penalties Gonzalez faces if convicted are 30 years of imprisonment and a fine of $1,000,000. Gonzalez was arrested and made his initial appearance in federal court. He was released on $10,000 bond and required to stay at home with electronic monitoring.
According to the indictment, during 2004 and 2005, Gonzalez negotiated the purchase of houses and entered into contracts with the sellers of the properties. For each property, Gonzalez retained an appraiser who appraised the property at a significantly inflated value requested by Gonzalez. At Gonzalez‘s direction, the inflated appraisal price was submitted to a lender in support of an application for a mortgage loan based upon the higher price. The lender was not informed that the price listed in the transaction documents was higher than the actual price negotiated with the seller.
The Indictment alleges further that at Gonzalez‘s direction, fraudulent financial documents and information, including such things as altered bank statements and payroll records, were submitted in support of the loan application. The false financial information was intended to cause the lender to approve a loan in a higher amount than would have been approved if true financial information had been submitted. At the closing on the property, Gonzalez received the difference between the loan amount, which was based on the inflated appraisal, and the actual purchase price, usually described with terms such as “assignment fee” or “payoff of second mortgage” that did not
exist. This difference was the proceeds of the fraud.
The indictment provides details of one transaction in which Gonzalez entered into an agreement to purchase a house for $490,000. He obtained an inflated appraisal of the house for $625,000 and submitted first and second mortgage loan applications reflecting a sales price of $625,000. Gonzalez also submitted altered bank account statements showing significantly larger cash balances in the account than were actually there. Based upon this information, the lender approved the loans. At the closing on the property, a check for $134,000 was issued to an entity controlled by Gonzalez. This amount was listed on closing documents as an “Assignment of Contract Fee.”
The case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and will be prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Arnold B. Corsmeier.
An indictment is merely a formal charge that a defendant has committed a violation of the federal criminal laws, and every defendant is presumed innocent until, and unless, proven guilty.
mortgage fraud
Why did this man ever think he was going to continue to get away with this?
Amanda <3
Posted by on 06/30 at 08:30 AM
Why didn’t they indicte the appraiser also? Without his fraudulent appraisals the defendant would not have been able to pull this fraud off. The appraiser should have been indicted for conspiracy to commit. 18 USC 1000 - 1344
Posted by on 07/02 at 07:32 AM
In some of these cases, the appraiser is helping the prosecution by testifying against the other players. That’s why they don’t always get indicted themselves.
Posted by on 07/02 at 09:03 AM
The problem is that it was the appraiser who inflated the value, therefore he is still a conspirator and should, at least, get a plea bargain but not just walk.
Posted by on 07/02 at 11:20 AM
The title of the article is misleading. Since it is the appraiser’s opinion of value that is used to secure the financing, then the appraiser should be held accountable for their opinion of value. Gonzalez was trying to get away with some kind of scam, but without an appraiser advocating for Gonzalez it never could have worked. Gonzalez did not inflate the value, but he may have inflated the price.
Posted by on 07/02 at 04:42 PM
Post a Comment
The trackback URL for this entry is:
Trackbacks:
|
Some Sources require Registration.
Mortgage Fraud Risk Index Jumps 11 Percent, According to Verisk Analytics Subsidiary Interthinx
CNNMoney.com
The report...indicates that the overall Interthinx Mortgage Fraud Risk Index surged more than 11 percent from the previous quarter...
Mortgage Fraud Case Appears Headed to Jury in Jackson County Circuit Court
The Jackson Citizen Patriot - MLive.com
The prosecution and defense rested Thursday in the mortgage fraud cases against Teresa Marie WIlson and Angelo Surveo Williams.
Wyoming Woman Charged with Mortgage Fraud After Allegedly Stealing Sister's Identity
MLive.com
A Wyoming woman is facing felony charges accusing her of stealing her sister's identity to obtain a mortgage...then defaulting on that mortgage, leaving taxpayers on the hook.
U.S. Attorney Targets White-Collar Crime
Wall Street Journal
In San Francisco, Mr. Russoniello said he is trying to crack down on cases like mortgage fraud, though he doesn't have the budget to hire additional white-collar prosecutors.
Arrests Made in Orlando Mortgage Fraud Roundup
MyFoxOrlando.com
During the real estate boom two years ago, some units were going for a half million dollars. Now some are short selling for just 50 grand.
10 Accused of Mortgage Fraud at PR Coastal Resort
Forbes
A developer and nine other people, including a former salsa singer, have been charged in an alleged $14 million mortgage fraud in Puerto Rico...
Strodtman Jury Selected in Mortgage Fraud Trial
Greeley Tribune
Attorneys will deliver opening statements this morning in the trial of Mark Strodtman, who is accused of bilking homeowners in a mortgage scheme years ago.
FHA Digging Out After Loans Sour
Wall Street Journal
Most banks rejected Ms. DeForte because her debt level was too high and her credit score too low. But Lend America put Ms. DeForte into a $402,000 loan backed by the Federal Housing Administration...
Mortgage Fraud Probe Nets 105 Across State
Bradenton Herald
At least one local man is among 105 people arrested across the state following a nine-month investigation into organized mortgage fraud.
Mortgage Fraud Increases
MortgageRates.co.nz
The number of frauds involving professional advisors, such as accountants and lawyers, has increased from two to four since March 2008.
Previous Articles
|
Trial coverage provided by Anne Mitchell, Crazy Fish Realty.
F. Jeffrey Miller Update - October 20, 2009
A hearing was held in Topeka, Kansas in front of Judge Julie Robinson. Miller is currently being held pending his sentencing which is set for December 22nd, 2009 at 9:00 a.m.. Steve Vanatta and Hallie Irvin, Miller's codefendants, will be sentenced at that time also.
Several motions were heard this week. One was a motion for Miller to be released pending his sentencing. Miller's attorney, Jeff Morris, argued that the court had dismmissed with predjudice the matter involving Miller's purchase of a commercial lawnmower, violating the court ordered monitoring agreement. He also argued that Miller was not a flight risk and should be released. This motion was denied.
Another motion heard by Judge Robinson was that of an escrow account containing proceeds from the sale of Miller's forfeited assets. This account has a balance of $143,000. Attorney Morris argued that his firm was due $100,000 for work done in the Miller matter, to date. The government argued that his 'un-itemized fees' were 'exhorbitant'. The balance of the funds, Morris argued, should be released to the Miller family to help pay for mounting household expenses.
The government argued that the 'Asset Forfeiture Provision' applies down to 'the last penny' and that 'the rights of the victims to made whole are of paramount immportance' and that no routine household expenses like Visa bills, are allowed.
Attorney Morris argues that there is more than enough assets to satisfy the jury's judgement of $2.65 million dollars. The government argues that the estimated value of his assets are only $1.4 million.
The government also stated that Miller has been paid dividends from a company Miller has an ownership interest in; Boreflex. From July, 2008 to present, Miller has been paid $330,509.30 from Boreflex, unbeknownst to the court appointed monitor.
Present in the courtroom was Todd Earnshaw. Earnshaw was indicted along with Miller and others in what is commonly referred to as 'Miller I'. That trial is scheduled to begin on January 11, 2010 in Topeka, Kansas.
More Trial Coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|