Friday, December 14, 2007
Foreclosure Rescue Company Required to Make Disclosures
Highland Financial, a Post Falls, Idaho business that offers mortgage foreclosure rescue services, will change its business and advertising practices. Under the terms of a legal settlement, Highland Financial agrees to comply with the Idaho Consumer Protection Act in its future advertising and promotions.
According to RealtyTrac, an organization that compiles foreclosure statistics, Idaho has experienced a 158% increase in foreclosure filings since October 2006. Due to the mortgage foreclosure crisis, foreclosure rescue businesses, which are a relatively new phenomenon, have multiplied.
Highland Financial advertised that it could help financially distressed consumers end the “stress,” “worries,” and “hassles” of foreclosure, bad credit, and eviction. The Attorney General alleged the company failed to make certain disclosures and may have misrepresented to homeowners that they could help homeowners retain ownership of their homes and improve their credit when that was not the case.
Highland Financial is not a state-registered credit repair business. Therefore, its past offer of free credit repair services allegedly misrepresented the company’s legal authority to provide homeowners with such assistance. “Under the terms of the settlement agreement, Highland Financial may not advertise that it offers debt counseling or credit repair services unless it establishes its qualifications and legal authority to provide those services to consumers,” Attorney General Wasden said.
Highland Financial also must inform consumers in writing of certain important facts before the consumer agrees to transfer ownership of their homes to a third party. Under the settlement, the company must:
· Explain to the homeowner the effect of a due-on-sale clause in an existing mortgage agreement. A due-on-sale clause may require the homeowner to pay off the mortgage when any interest in the property is transferred to another.
· Provide the consumer with his or her home’s current fair market value as determined by a real estate appraiser, the county assessor, or by another method agreed upon by the consumer.
· Disclose the approximate amount of equity that the consumer might lose, which must be calculated by subtracting the value of the home’s existing liens from the home’s fair market value.
· Inform homeowners that the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) offers information to consumers about how to avoid foreclosure and that HUD maintains a current list of approved housing counseling agencies.
“It is important for consumers who are facing the possibility of losing their homes to work with their lenders to find an alternative to foreclosure,” Attorney General Wasden emphasized. “HUD-approved housing counselors will provide consumers with free information about government and private organizations that offer assistance to financially distressed homeowners.”
Consumers should avoid doing business with individuals or companies that:
· Offer to negotiate with your lender for a fee;
· Discourage you from consulting with your lender or an attorney;
· Promise to pay off your mortgage if you give up your equity;
· Offer to rent the property back to you for more than your monthly mortgage payment; or
· Require you to sign your deed over to someone else. This does not necessarily relieve you from responsibility for the debt. Therefore, if the “buyer” fails to make the mortgage payments, the obligation falls on you.
Under the terms of the settlement, Highland Financial must pay $1,000 in civil penalties and reimburse the Attorney General’s Office $2,000 in attorney fees and costs. Highland Financial did not admit any liability or wrongdoing and cooperated with the Attorney General during his investigation.
mortgage fraud
I was the person who not only turned Highland Financial into the Idaho Attorney General’s Office, but lobbied Idaho’s legislators to make some kind of law to protect her citizens against predators like this company. They not only deceptively took my home, but also $70,000.
I hope that that no one else needs to lose their home to these “distressed property,” “we buy homes,” “foreclosure rescue” scams.
Posted by on 02/02 at 03:45 PM
Post a Comment
The trackback URL for this entry is:
Trackbacks:
|
Some Sources require Registration.
Mortgage Scam Ends with Prison
The Morning Call
A judge didn't hold back when Shirley Matthews appeared before him Tuesday to be sentenced for stealing from a Monroe County man instead of helping him save his home from foreclosure, as she was hired to do.
Woman Gets Prison Time After Mortgage Scam Conviction
Pocono Record
A New Jersey woman will be spending two to five years in state prison after she was sentenced on Tuesday for promising to help homeowners avoid foreclosure and then keeping the money she was given for their mortgages.
2 Indicted in Mortgage Scam Face New Charges
Newsday.Com
Prosecutors add extra charges to two who are charged in LI mortgage fraud with county legislator, dominatrix and her husband
Untangling Mortgage Fraud in Chicago Condo Buildings
Chicago Public Radio
Why did so many units go into foreclosure all at once? In some cases, the reason can be traced to mortgage fraud.
No Contest Plea Entered in Real Estate Fraud Case
Northbay Business Journal
Juan Carlos Alcala of Windsor pleaded no contest to nineteen felony counts and admitted three special allegations for defrauding real estate investors, money laundering and elder fraud.
Bedford Woman Sentenced to a Year in Prison for Mortgage Fraud
Plain Dealer
Sharon Cox, 49, of Bedford, was sentenced today to a year in prison for mortgage fraud involving money laundering, theft and receiving stolen property from August 2008 through March.
CITIZEN JOURNALISM: Mortgage Fraud High in Area
Washington Times
According to the FBI, Virginia, Maryland and the District are among the top 10 jurisdictions experiencing mortgage fraud.
Former Vegas Resident Charged with Mortgage Fraud in Nevada
National Mortgage Professional Magazine
A former Las Vegas resident has been charged with federal conspiracy and fraud charges for his involvement in a Nevada mortgage fraud scheme involving straw buyers and falsified mortgage loan documents...
Missouri Man Sentenced for Mortgage Fraud
Belleville News Democrat
A suburban St. Louis mortgage company operator has been sentenced to more than 11 years in prison for a mortgage fraud scheme.
12-Year Prison Term in Mortgage Swindle
Washington Post
A Maryland woman who stole millions from Washington area homeowners trying to avoid foreclosure is a "vulture" whose case should serve as a warning to other con artists...
Previous Articles
|
Trial coverage provided by Anne Mitchell, Crazy Fish Realty.
F. Jeffrey Miller Update - October 20, 2009
A hearing was held in Topeka, Kansas in front of Judge Julie Robinson. Miller is currently being held pending his sentencing which is set for December 22nd, 2009 at 9:00 a.m.. Steve Vanatta and Hallie Irvin, Miller's codefendants, will be sentenced at that time also.
Several motions were heard this week. One was a motion for Miller to be released pending his sentencing. Miller's attorney, Jeff Morris, argued that the court had dismmissed with predjudice the matter involving Miller's purchase of a commercial lawnmower, violating the court ordered monitoring agreement. He also argued that Miller was not a flight risk and should be released. This motion was denied.
Another motion heard by Judge Robinson was that of an escrow account containing proceeds from the sale of Miller's forfeited assets. This account has a balance of $143,000. Attorney Morris argued that his firm was due $100,000 for work done in the Miller matter, to date. The government argued that his 'un-itemized fees' were 'exhorbitant'. The balance of the funds, Morris argued, should be released to the Miller family to help pay for mounting household expenses.
The government argued that the 'Asset Forfeiture Provision' applies down to 'the last penny' and that 'the rights of the victims to made whole are of paramount immportance' and that no routine household expenses like Visa bills, are allowed.
Attorney Morris argues that there is more than enough assets to satisfy the jury's judgement of $2.65 million dollars. The government argues that the estimated value of his assets are only $1.4 million.
The government also stated that Miller has been paid dividends from a company Miller has an ownership interest in; Boreflex. From July, 2008 to present, Miller has been paid $330,509.30 from Boreflex, unbeknownst to the court appointed monitor.
Present in the courtroom was Todd Earnshaw. Earnshaw was indicted along with Miller and others in what is commonly referred to as 'Miller I'. That trial is scheduled to begin on January 11, 2010 in Topeka, Kansas.
More Trial Coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|