Mortgage Fraud Blog is the premier website for news and information on mortgage fraud and real estate fraud throughout the United States.
imageRachel Dollar, the editor of Mortgage Fraud Blog, is an attorney and Certified Mortgage Banker who handles litigation for lending institutions and secondary market investors. She is an author and a nationally recognized speaker on the topic of mortgage fraud. Ms. Dollar is a shareholder with the law firm of Smith Dollar, PC, is licensed to practice law in California and maintains offices in Santa Rosa, California. Email Ms. Dollar

Mortgage Fraud Blog is co-sponsored by Interthinx the leading provider of fraud services and solutions for the mortgage industry.



Advanced Search
Enter your Email


Powered by FeedBlitz

Dollar in the News

August 6, 2009 - Inman News
The Lowdown on Downpayment Programs

July, 2009 - Mortgage Banking Magazine
Flashpoint - FHA Fraud

June 5, 2009 - Miami Herald
Feds Get Tough on Mortgage Fraud

More Articles
-->
- Criminal Action by Georgia Dept of Banking Results in Guilty Plea
- Guilty Plea In Real Estate Ponzi Scheme
- Maryland Woman Pleads Guilty to Mortgage Fraud Scheme in D.C. and Maryland
- Texas Fraudster Admits to Falsifying Documents
- Mortgage Fraud Results in Charges for West Michigan Woman
- Mortgage Fraud Surge Investigation Nets 100+
- Marc Dreier Co-Conspirator Pleads Guilty
- Real Estate Fund Manager Charged With Defrauding Investors
- Ringleader of Mortgage Fraud Scheme Sentenced to 30 Years
- Department of Finance Orders Meridian Mortgage Loan Modification Company to Cease & Desist
-->

Syndicate

You're welcome to post our feed on your site and provide your readers with the latest Headlines! Just select "Get Widget" below . . .
  

Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Bookmark and Share

What's this?

Friday, December 01, 2006

Kansas Builder Indicted On New Charges

The First Rule of Holes - When you’re in one, stop digging . . .

A grand jury in Topeka, Kansas returned an indictment charging a Kansas City home builder with violating a court order and trying to interfere with a federal investigation.

Already under indictment on charges including conspiracy to commit bank fraud and money laundering, F. Jeffrey Miller, 45, Stanley, Kansas, was allowed to continue doing business after agreeing that an outside consultant could monitor his activities on behalf of the court.

The new indictment charges that Mr. Miller continued to operate illegally while being monitored, and conspired with others to interfere with the federal investigation into his business practices,” said U.S. Attorney Eric Melgren.

Miller was arrested Thursday morning.  Charged along with Miller in the new indictment are Stephen W. Vanatta, 43, Lenexa, Kansas, Hallie Irvin, 26, Lenexa, Kansas, and James Sparks, 35, Lawson, Missouri.

Miller, a building contractor in Kansas, Missouri and other states, sold homes under the name of Miller Enterprises, Star Land Development, Somerset Homes, Dutch Custom Homes and other companies. He was indicted May 17, 2006, along with eight other people on charges of conspiracy to commit bank fraud and money laundering. The government sought the forfeiture of more than $25 million in proceeds from the alleged fraud.

In the May indictment, Miller and the conspirators were accused of targeting home-buyers with poor credit, obtaining inflated appraisals, submitting false information to lenders, and manipulating home buyers to move into homes before closing and then increasing the purchase price at closing when buyers were under pressure to accept the terms for fear of losing their homes.

After he was indicted, Miller was released on his own recognizance pending trial. He was allowed to continue doing business under an arrangement in which he agreed to abide by all federal, state and local laws and to permit his business transactions to be monitored by Meara King & Company of Kansas City.

The new indictment charges that:

Miller knew when he signed the monitoring agreement that he was in fact continuing to engage in criminal conduct through a new conspiracy with Stephen Vanetta, Hallie Irvin, James Sparks and others.

– To induce Vanatta and Irvin to continue to cooperate in the conspiracy, Miller agreed to cosign a note to allow Vanetta and Irvin to buy a property at 415 Regency Cove, Lake Ozark, Missouri. Miller agreed with Vanatta and Irvin that they would use part of the money to purchase from him a 1998, 45-foot Sea Ray boat known as “Bling Bling.” The conspirators knew that Vanatta and Irvin could not provide a legitimate history of assets and income to qualify for the loan and would have to create and present false documents to obtain the loan from First National Bank, Lake Ozark, Missouri.

Miller, Vanatta and Irvin ran an office at 10777 Barkley, Overland Park, Kansas, where they marketed homes under the names Miller Enterprises, Dutch Custom Homes, Star Land Development and Somerset Homes. They created advertisements soliciting home buyers with credit problems, promising no money down and financing by the builder.

At 10777 Barkley, the conspirators kept business records including credit information, loan application information, sales contracts and falsified rent verification documents that they referred to as “friend letters.” Among the records was evidence that the conspirators unilaterally increased the sales price on homes before closing, forged buyers’ signatures and caused buyers to submit “friend letters” that contained falsified rent history in order to obtain loans that they would not otherwise qualify to receive.

In August 2006, federal investigators obtained a subpoena for the conspirators’ business records based on information that “friend letters” containing falsified rent histories were being kept at 10777 Barkley. An employee who worked for the conspirators received the federal subpoena and notified Vanatta that she would retrieve the records to comply with the court order. When the employee got to the office, the files had been sanitized to remove the incriminating evidence.

James Sparks was a loan broker in the greater Kansas City area who referred home buyers to Miller, Vanatta and Irvin. He collaborated with Miller, Vanatta and Irvin by knowingly preparing and submitting false financial information for home buyers who were applying for loans from federally insured lenders. Sparks paid kickbacks to Irvin on behalf of Vanatta of 40 percent of loan closings to maintain business with Miller Enterprises. He provided down payments to home buyers and referred falsified and inflated sales contracts to appraisers selected by Vanatta knowing that they would inflate appraisals to cover altered sales prices. At Vanatta’s direction, he shredded and deleted incriminating documents.

In the 12-count indictment returned Wednesday, Miller, Vanatta, Irvin and Sparks each are charged with:

– One count of conspiracy to commit bank fraud

– Two counts of bank fraud

– Two counts of engaging in unlawful monetary transactions

– One count of destroying records in a federal investigation

– Four counts of criminal contempt of a court order

In addition, Miller, Vanatta and Irvin are charged with one count of attempting to intimidate a federal witness by inducing Sparks to withhold records and testimony in a grand jury investigation.

In the 12th Count the Government seeks the forfeiture of more than $5 million in proceeds from the crimes, including the assets of Miller Enterprises, Star Land Development, Somerset Homes, Dutch Custom Homes, HCI, Innovative Designs and any other entities organized by Miller, Vanatta, Irvin and Sparks. Property listed in the forfeiture count includes a residence at 425 Regency Cove, Lake Ozark, Missouri; a 1998, 45-foot Sea Ray boat known as “Bling Bling;” a 2006, 50-foot Sea Ray boat known as “Pipe Dream;” and a 1998 Piper Seneca V Aircraft.

Upon conviction, the crimes carry the following penalties:

– Conspiracy: A maximum penalty of 5 years in federal prison and a fine up to $250,000.

– Bank fraud: A maximum penalty of 30 years and a fine up to $1 million on each count.

– Unlawful monetary transactions: A maximum penalty of 10 years and a fine up to $250,000.

– Destruction of records in a federal investigation: A maximum penalty of 20 years and a fine up to $250,000.

– Attempting to intimidate a witness: A maximum penalty of 10 years and a fine up to $250,000.

– Criminal contempt: A maximum penalty of 5 years and a fine at the court’s discretion.

 mortgage fraud

   

Posted by Rachel Dollar on 12/01/06 at 04:48 AM
Mortgage FraudKansasMissouri • Total comments: (2) (0) Trackbacks
  1. Why aren’t those appraisers indicted too?  They are necessary to make the fraud work, aren’t they?

    Posted by  on  12/03  at  02:06 PM
  2. I find it very sad that people are now assumed to be guilty until they can prove their innocence.The judges and prosecuting attorneys in this country do whatever they want to get convictions. It doesn’t even seem to matter to them if the defendents are guilty or not as long as someone is convicted. What a shame to see so many lives ruined by these judges and prosecuters.

    Posted by  on  11/18  at  02:07 PM

Post a Comment

Name:

Email:

Location:

Smileys

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


The trackback URL for this entry is:

Trackbacks:

Bookmark and Share Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz
mortgage fraud news



Today's News

Some Sources require Registration.

 

Mortgage Fraud Risk Index Jumps 11 Percent, According to Verisk Analytics Subsidiary Interthinx
CNNMoney.com
The report...indicates that the overall Interthinx Mortgage Fraud Risk Index surged more than 11 percent from the previous quarter...

Mortgage Fraud Case Appears Headed to Jury in Jackson County Circuit Court
The Jackson Citizen Patriot - MLive.com
The prosecution and defense rested Thursday in the mortgage fraud cases against Teresa Marie WIlson and Angelo Surveo Williams.

Wyoming Woman Charged with Mortgage Fraud After Allegedly Stealing Sister's Identity
MLive.com
A Wyoming woman is facing felony charges accusing her of stealing her sister's identity to obtain a mortgage...then defaulting on that mortgage, leaving taxpayers on the hook.

U.S. Attorney Targets White-Collar Crime
Wall Street Journal
In San Francisco, Mr. Russoniello said he is trying to crack down on cases like mortgage fraud, though he doesn't have the budget to hire additional white-collar prosecutors.

Arrests Made in Orlando Mortgage Fraud Roundup
MyFoxOrlando.com
During the real estate boom two years ago, some units were going for a half million dollars. Now some are short selling for just 50 grand.

10 Accused of Mortgage Fraud at PR Coastal Resort
Forbes
A developer and nine other people, including a former salsa singer, have been charged in an alleged $14 million mortgage fraud in Puerto Rico...

Strodtman Jury Selected in Mortgage Fraud Trial
Greeley Tribune
Attorneys will deliver opening statements this morning in the trial of Mark Strodtman, who is accused of bilking homeowners in a mortgage scheme years ago.

FHA Digging Out After Loans Sour
Wall Street Journal
Most banks rejected Ms. DeForte because her debt level was too high and her credit score too low. But Lend America put Ms. DeForte into a $402,000 loan backed by the Federal Housing Administration...

Mortgage Fraud Probe Nets 105 Across State
Bradenton Herald
At least one local man is among 105 people arrested across the state following a nine-month investigation into organized mortgage fraud.

Mortgage Fraud Increases
MortgageRates.co.nz
The number of frauds involving professional advisors, such as accountants and lawyers, has increased from two to four since March 2008.

Previous Articles

TRIAL COVERAGE

Trial coverage provided by Anne Mitchell, Crazy Fish Realty.

F. Jeffrey Miller Update - October 20, 2009

A hearing was held in Topeka, Kansas in front of Judge Julie Robinson. Miller is currently being held pending his sentencing which is set for December 22nd, 2009 at 9:00 a.m.. Steve Vanatta and Hallie Irvin, Miller's codefendants, will be sentenced at that time also.

Several motions were heard this week. One was a motion for Miller to be released pending his sentencing. Miller's attorney, Jeff Morris, argued that the court had dismmissed with predjudice the matter involving Miller's purchase of a commercial lawnmower, violating the court ordered monitoring agreement. He also argued that Miller was not a flight risk and should be released. This motion was denied

Another motion heard by Judge Robinson was that of an escrow account containing proceeds from the sale of Miller's forfeited assets. This account has a balance of $143,000. Attorney Morris argued that his firm was due $100,000 for work done in the Miller matter, to date. The government argued that his 'un-itemized fees' were 'exhorbitant'. The balance of the funds, Morris argued, should be released to the Miller family to help pay for mounting household expenses.

The government argued that the 'Asset Forfeiture Provision' applies down to 'the last penny' and that 'the rights of the victims to made whole are of paramount immportance' and that no routine household expenses like Visa bills, are allowed.

Attorney Morris argues that there is more than enough assets to satisfy the jury's judgement of $2.65 million dollars. The government argues that the estimated value of his assets are only $1.4 million.

The government also stated that Miller has been paid dividends from a company Miller has an ownership interest in; Boreflex. From July, 2008 to present, Miller has been paid $330,509.30 from Boreflex, unbeknownst to the court appointed monitor.

Present in the courtroom was Todd Earnshaw. Earnshaw was indicted along with Miller and others in what is commonly referred to as 'Miller I'. That trial is scheduled to begin on January 11, 2010 in Topeka, Kansas.



More Trial Coverage

What's Your Opinion?

ORDER NOW!!

Blog Roll

TopOfBlogsReal Estate BlogsBlog Flux DirectoryBlog Directory & Search engineBlog Directory
Blogarama - The Blog DirectoryListed on BlogShares

© Copyright 2004-2009 Rachel M. Dollar

Legal Disclaimer.
The information and notices contained on Mortgage Fraud Blog are intended to summarize recent developments in mortgage fraud cases and mortgage banking matters nationwide. The posts on this site are presented as general research and information and are expressly not intended, and should not be regarded, as legal advice. Much of the information on this site concerns allegations made in civil lawsuits and in criminal indictments. All persons are presumed innocent until convicted of a crime. Readers who have particular questions about mortgage banking, mortgage fraud matters or who believe they require legal counsel should seek the advice of an attorney. The creators, editors and sponsors of Mortgage Fraud Blog do not intend to create a confidential relationship or an attorney-client relationship by communication via or arising from this site.

TopOfBlogs Real Estate Blogs Blog Flux Directory Blog Directory & Search engine Blog Directory
Blogarama - The Blog Directory Listed on BlogShares