Tuesday, December 11, 2007
Law Firm, Lender & Broker Settle Kickback Allegations
Reiner & Bendett, P.C., a Farmington, Connecticut law firm, Absolute Mortgage Solutions, LLC, an East Hartford, Connecticut lender, and Access America, LCC, DBA Century 21 Access America, a Wethersfield, Connecticut broker, will pay $700,000 in fines, forfeitures and restitution to settle allegations they engaged in illegal kickback and inducement schemes. Of the money, $125,000 will pay restitution to about 500 Absolute consumers who overpaid for certain mortgage-related services as a result of one of the schemes.
In an October 2007 lawsuit filed on behalf of the Department of Consumer Protection (DCP) Commissioner and the Insurance Department, it was alleged that Reiner, which also sells title insurance, used sham service, rental and other agreements to conceal $142,200 in kickbacks and unlawful inducements between 2002 and 2005. In exchange, Absolute and Access allegedly steered title insurance business to the law firm. Connecticut law prohibits title insurance agents from paying for referrals.
“This law firm used service and other sham contracts to camouflage kickbacks and sidetrack state law,” Attorney General Richard Blumenthal said. “Consumers were overcharged because of this underhanded scheme. Reiner and Absolute conspired to conceal illegal payments as fake fees, secretly forcing consumers to cover the cost of kickbacks. The law firm hid illicit payments to Access in phony ‘marketing’ and ‘rental’ agreements. These steering schemes increased consumers’ costs and denied choice, while unjustly enriching the lawbreakers.”
“Each of about 500 consumers will receive $200 early in the New Year. These firms will rightly give back their ill-gotten gains to compensate consumers and help the state fight similar schemes. I will fight to enforce state laws banning kickbacks and other anticompetitive practices that increase costs to consumers,” Blumenthal added.
Insurance Commissioner Thomas R. Sullivan said, “This type of practice is not only harmful, but it puts yet another burden on homebuyers by adding unnecessary expense to real estate transactions involving title insurance.”
DCP Commissioner Jerry Farrell, Jr., said, “Today’s settlement should serve as a very strong message to the real estate community that behavior of this sort is clearly against the law and will be prosecuted. It is of particular concern to me as the licensor of real estate salespeople and brokers to hear that this has occurred, and if we find other examples they will be equally and vigorously investigated.”
Reiner agreed to pay mortgage broker Absolute $200 per customer to perform certain closing services, including ordering a title search, assembling closing documents, assuring insurance was in place and coordinating the closing. Reiner paid Absolute $76,200 in 2004 under the agreement.
Consumers, however, had already paid Absolute for the same and other services. Blumenthal and Sullivan charged that the arrangement was a ruse to conceal illegal payments to Absolute for steering customers to Reiner for their title insurance.
Under the settlement announced today, about 500 Absolute customers are eligible to receive $200, returning unnecessary fees charged them to underwrite the kickback scheme. Consumers will be notified by mail how to apply for the refund.
Reiner used two other bogus agreements to conceal $66,000 in kickbacks to Access between 2002 and 2005. One contract called for Reiner to pay Access for nonexistent “marketing” services. Under a second oral agreement, Reiner paid Access to “rent” space in Access offices for closings and other business.
Of the $700,000, $125,000 will compensate Absolute consumers, $425,000 will be deposited into the state’s General Fund and the remainder used for consumer education by the Attorney General’s Office, DCP and the Insurance Department.
The agreement caps a two-year joint investigation by the Insurance Department and the Attorney General’s Office. The investigation was prompted by unusual market activity reported to the Insurance Department. DCP and the Banking Department also participated.
mortgage fraud
Situations like these can be avoided if there is a direct and continuous contact between the seller and the buyer, especially if both parties are given enough time to scrutinize details of the estate. If people could only realize the perks of their mobile’s network service, they might be saved from these kinds of fraud. For the buyers, try to ask your network. For the agents, you still have to ask your network
Posted by on 12/11 at 08:44 AM
Good. This helps the parties to transactions that are acting honestly. One sad note for the borrowers that paid too much at closing, AND included those fees in the loan amount: they will be paying finance charges on those fees for the life of the loan. That adds up!
Posted by on 12/13 at 04:08 AM
Post a Comment
The trackback URL for this entry is:
Trackbacks:
|
Some Sources require Registration.
Mortgage Fraud Risk Index Jumps 11 Percent, According to Verisk Analytics Subsidiary Interthinx
CNNMoney.com
The report...indicates that the overall Interthinx Mortgage Fraud Risk Index surged more than 11 percent from the previous quarter...
Mortgage Fraud Case Appears Headed to Jury in Jackson County Circuit Court
The Jackson Citizen Patriot - MLive.com
The prosecution and defense rested Thursday in the mortgage fraud cases against Teresa Marie WIlson and Angelo Surveo Williams.
Wyoming Woman Charged with Mortgage Fraud After Allegedly Stealing Sister's Identity
MLive.com
A Wyoming woman is facing felony charges accusing her of stealing her sister's identity to obtain a mortgage...then defaulting on that mortgage, leaving taxpayers on the hook.
U.S. Attorney Targets White-Collar Crime
Wall Street Journal
In San Francisco, Mr. Russoniello said he is trying to crack down on cases like mortgage fraud, though he doesn't have the budget to hire additional white-collar prosecutors.
Arrests Made in Orlando Mortgage Fraud Roundup
MyFoxOrlando.com
During the real estate boom two years ago, some units were going for a half million dollars. Now some are short selling for just 50 grand.
10 Accused of Mortgage Fraud at PR Coastal Resort
Forbes
A developer and nine other people, including a former salsa singer, have been charged in an alleged $14 million mortgage fraud in Puerto Rico...
Strodtman Jury Selected in Mortgage Fraud Trial
Greeley Tribune
Attorneys will deliver opening statements this morning in the trial of Mark Strodtman, who is accused of bilking homeowners in a mortgage scheme years ago.
FHA Digging Out After Loans Sour
Wall Street Journal
Most banks rejected Ms. DeForte because her debt level was too high and her credit score too low. But Lend America put Ms. DeForte into a $402,000 loan backed by the Federal Housing Administration...
Mortgage Fraud Probe Nets 105 Across State
Bradenton Herald
At least one local man is among 105 people arrested across the state following a nine-month investigation into organized mortgage fraud.
Mortgage Fraud Increases
MortgageRates.co.nz
The number of frauds involving professional advisors, such as accountants and lawyers, has increased from two to four since March 2008.
Previous Articles
|
Trial coverage provided by Anne Mitchell, Crazy Fish Realty.
F. Jeffrey Miller Update - October 20, 2009
A hearing was held in Topeka, Kansas in front of Judge Julie Robinson. Miller is currently being held pending his sentencing which is set for December 22nd, 2009 at 9:00 a.m.. Steve Vanatta and Hallie Irvin, Miller's codefendants, will be sentenced at that time also.
Several motions were heard this week. One was a motion for Miller to be released pending his sentencing. Miller's attorney, Jeff Morris, argued that the court had dismmissed with predjudice the matter involving Miller's purchase of a commercial lawnmower, violating the court ordered monitoring agreement. He also argued that Miller was not a flight risk and should be released. This motion was denied.
Another motion heard by Judge Robinson was that of an escrow account containing proceeds from the sale of Miller's forfeited assets. This account has a balance of $143,000. Attorney Morris argued that his firm was due $100,000 for work done in the Miller matter, to date. The government argued that his 'un-itemized fees' were 'exhorbitant'. The balance of the funds, Morris argued, should be released to the Miller family to help pay for mounting household expenses.
The government argued that the 'Asset Forfeiture Provision' applies down to 'the last penny' and that 'the rights of the victims to made whole are of paramount immportance' and that no routine household expenses like Visa bills, are allowed.
Attorney Morris argues that there is more than enough assets to satisfy the jury's judgement of $2.65 million dollars. The government argues that the estimated value of his assets are only $1.4 million.
The government also stated that Miller has been paid dividends from a company Miller has an ownership interest in; Boreflex. From July, 2008 to present, Miller has been paid $330,509.30 from Boreflex, unbeknownst to the court appointed monitor.
Present in the courtroom was Todd Earnshaw. Earnshaw was indicted along with Miller and others in what is commonly referred to as 'Miller I'. That trial is scheduled to begin on January 11, 2010 in Topeka, Kansas.
More Trial Coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|