Mortgage Fraud Blog is the premier website for news and information on mortgage fraud and real estate fraud throughout the United States.
imageRachel Dollar, the editor of Mortgage Fraud Blog, is an attorney and Certified Mortgage Banker who handles litigation for lending institutions and secondary market investors. She is an author and a nationally recognized speaker on the topic of mortgage fraud. Ms. Dollar is a shareholder with the law firm of Smith Dollar, PC, is licensed to practice law in California and maintains offices in Santa Rosa, California. Email Ms. Dollar

Mortgage Fraud Blog is co-sponsored by Interthinx the leading provider of fraud services and solutions for the mortgage industry.



Advanced Search
Enter your Email


Powered by FeedBlitz

Dollar in the News

August 6, 2009 - Inman News
The Lowdown on Downpayment Programs

July, 2009 - Mortgage Banking Magazine
Flashpoint - FHA Fraud

June 5, 2009 - Miami Herald
Feds Get Tough on Mortgage Fraud

More Articles
-->
- Guaranty Title Owners Indicted for Fraud and Money Laundering
- Mortgage Fraudster Admits Laundering Ill Gotten Gains
- Builder Convicted In Mortgage Scheme
- Identity Thief Pleads Guilty to Mortgage Fraud
- 7 Charged in Million Dollar Mortgage Fraud Scheme
- Appraiser Indicted for False Statements
- Professor Sentenced for Mortgage Fraud Scheme
- Second Missouri Man Sentenced in Major Mortgage Fraud Scheme
- Deed Forger Sentenced in Real Estate Fraud Case
- Man Arrested for Real Estate Ponzi Scheme
-->

Syndicate

You're welcome to post our feed on your site and provide your readers with the latest Headlines! Just select "Get Widget" below . . .
  

Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Bookmark and Share

What's this?

Tuesday, December 11, 2007

Law Firm, Lender & Broker Settle Kickback Allegations

Reiner & Bendett, P.C., a Farmington, Connecticut law firm, Absolute Mortgage Solutions, LLC, an East Hartford, Connecticut lender, and Access America, LCC, DBA Century 21 Access America, a Wethersfield, Connecticut broker, will pay $700,000 in fines, forfeitures and restitution to settle allegations they engaged in illegal kickback and inducement schemes. Of the money, $125,000 will pay restitution to about 500 Absolute consumers who overpaid for certain mortgage-related services as a result of one of the schemes.

In an October 2007 lawsuit filed on behalf of the Department of Consumer Protection (DCP) Commissioner and the Insurance Department, it was alleged that Reiner, which also sells title insurance, used sham service, rental and other agreements to conceal $142,200 in kickbacks and unlawful inducements between 2002 and 2005. In exchange, Absolute and Access allegedly steered title insurance business to the law firm. Connecticut law prohibits title insurance agents from paying for referrals.

“This law firm used service and other sham contracts to camouflage kickbacks and sidetrack state law,” Attorney General Richard Blumenthal said. “Consumers were overcharged because of this underhanded scheme. Reiner and Absolute conspired to conceal illegal payments as fake fees, secretly forcing consumers to cover the cost of kickbacks. The law firm hid illicit payments to Access in phony ‘marketing’ and ‘rental’ agreements. These steering schemes increased consumers’ costs and denied choice, while unjustly enriching the lawbreakers.”

“Each of about 500 consumers will receive $200 early in the New Year. These firms will rightly give back their ill-gotten gains to compensate consumers and help the state fight similar schemes. I will fight to enforce state laws banning kickbacks and other anticompetitive practices that increase costs to consumers,” Blumenthal added.

Insurance Commissioner Thomas R. Sullivan said, “This type of practice is not only harmful, but it puts yet another burden on homebuyers by adding unnecessary expense to real estate transactions involving title insurance.”

DCP Commissioner Jerry Farrell, Jr., said, “Today’s settlement should serve as a very strong message to the real estate community that behavior of this sort is clearly against the law and will be prosecuted. It is of particular concern to me as the licensor of real estate salespeople and brokers to hear that this has occurred, and if we find other examples they will be equally and vigorously investigated.”

Reiner agreed to pay mortgage broker Absolute $200 per customer to perform certain closing services, including ordering a title search, assembling closing documents, assuring insurance was in place and coordinating the closing. Reiner paid Absolute $76,200 in 2004 under the agreement.

Consumers, however, had already paid Absolute for the same and other services. Blumenthal and Sullivan charged that the arrangement was a ruse to conceal illegal payments to Absolute for steering customers to Reiner for their title insurance.

Under the settlement announced today, about 500 Absolute customers are eligible to receive $200, returning unnecessary fees charged them to underwrite the kickback scheme. Consumers will be notified by mail how to apply for the refund.

Reiner used two other bogus agreements to conceal $66,000 in kickbacks to Access between 2002 and 2005. One contract called for Reiner to pay Access for nonexistent “marketing” services. Under a second oral agreement, Reiner paid Access to “rent” space in Access offices for closings and other business.

Of the $700,000, $125,000 will compensate Absolute consumers, $425,000 will be deposited into the state’s General Fund and the remainder used for consumer education by the Attorney General’s Office, DCP and the Insurance Department.

The agreement caps a two-year joint investigation by the Insurance Department and the Attorney General’s Office. The investigation was prompted by unusual market activity reported to the Insurance Department. DCP and the Banking Department also participated.

 mortgage fraud

   

Posted by Staff Reporter on 12/11/07 at 05:43 AM
Mortgage Fraud LocationsConnecticut • Total comments: (2) (0) Trackbacks
  1. Situations like these can be avoided if there is a direct and continuous contact between the seller and the buyer, especially if both parties are given enough time to scrutinize details of the estate. If people could only realize the perks of their mobile’s network service, they might be saved from these kinds of fraud. For the buyers, try to ask your network. For the agents, you still have to ask your network

    Posted by  on  12/11  at  08:44 AM
  2. Good. This helps the parties to transactions that are acting honestly. One sad note for the borrowers that paid too much at closing, AND included those fees in the loan amount: they will be paying finance charges on those fees for the life of the loan. That adds up!

    Posted by  on  12/13  at  04:08 AM

Post a Comment

Name:

Email:

Location:

Smileys

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


The trackback URL for this entry is:

Trackbacks:

Bookmark and Share Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz
mortgage fraud news



Today's News

Some Sources require Registration.

 

Mortgage Scam Ends with Prison
The Morning Call
A judge didn't hold back when Shirley Matthews appeared before him Tuesday to be sentenced for stealing from a Monroe County man instead of helping him save his home from foreclosure, as she was hired to do.

Woman Gets Prison Time After Mortgage Scam Conviction
Pocono Record
A New Jersey woman will be spending two to five years in state prison after she was sentenced on Tuesday for promising to help homeowners avoid foreclosure and then keeping the money she was given for their mortgages.

2 Indicted in Mortgage Scam Face New Charges
Newsday.Com
Prosecutors add extra charges to two who are charged in LI mortgage fraud with county legislator, dominatrix and her husband

Untangling Mortgage Fraud in Chicago Condo Buildings
Chicago Public Radio
Why did so many units go into foreclosure all at once? In some cases, the reason can be traced to mortgage fraud.

No Contest Plea Entered in Real Estate Fraud Case
Northbay Business Journal
Juan Carlos Alcala of Windsor pleaded no contest to nineteen felony counts and admitted three special allegations for defrauding real estate investors, money laundering and elder fraud.

Bedford Woman Sentenced to a Year in Prison for Mortgage Fraud
Plain Dealer
Sharon Cox, 49, of Bedford, was sentenced today to a year in prison for mortgage fraud involving money laundering, theft and receiving stolen property from August 2008 through March.

CITIZEN JOURNALISM: Mortgage Fraud High in Area
Washington Times
According to the FBI, Virginia, Maryland and the District are among the top 10 jurisdictions experiencing mortgage fraud.

Former Vegas Resident Charged with Mortgage Fraud in Nevada
National Mortgage Professional Magazine
A former Las Vegas resident has been charged with federal conspiracy and fraud charges for his involvement in a Nevada mortgage fraud scheme involving straw buyers and falsified mortgage loan documents...

Missouri Man Sentenced for Mortgage Fraud
Belleville News Democrat
A suburban St. Louis mortgage company operator has been sentenced to more than 11 years in prison for a mortgage fraud scheme.

12-Year Prison Term in Mortgage Swindle
Washington Post
A Maryland woman who stole millions from Washington area homeowners trying to avoid foreclosure is a "vulture" whose case should serve as a warning to other con artists...

Previous Articles

TRIAL COVERAGE

Trial coverage provided by Anne Mitchell, Crazy Fish Realty.

F. Jeffrey Miller Update - October 20, 2009

A hearing was held in Topeka, Kansas in front of Judge Julie Robinson. Miller is currently being held pending his sentencing which is set for December 22nd, 2009 at 9:00 a.m.. Steve Vanatta and Hallie Irvin, Miller's codefendants, will be sentenced at that time also.

Several motions were heard this week. One was a motion for Miller to be released pending his sentencing. Miller's attorney, Jeff Morris, argued that the court had dismmissed with predjudice the matter involving Miller's purchase of a commercial lawnmower, violating the court ordered monitoring agreement. He also argued that Miller was not a flight risk and should be released. This motion was denied

Another motion heard by Judge Robinson was that of an escrow account containing proceeds from the sale of Miller's forfeited assets. This account has a balance of $143,000. Attorney Morris argued that his firm was due $100,000 for work done in the Miller matter, to date. The government argued that his 'un-itemized fees' were 'exhorbitant'. The balance of the funds, Morris argued, should be released to the Miller family to help pay for mounting household expenses.

The government argued that the 'Asset Forfeiture Provision' applies down to 'the last penny' and that 'the rights of the victims to made whole are of paramount immportance' and that no routine household expenses like Visa bills, are allowed.

Attorney Morris argues that there is more than enough assets to satisfy the jury's judgement of $2.65 million dollars. The government argues that the estimated value of his assets are only $1.4 million.

The government also stated that Miller has been paid dividends from a company Miller has an ownership interest in; Boreflex. From July, 2008 to present, Miller has been paid $330,509.30 from Boreflex, unbeknownst to the court appointed monitor.

Present in the courtroom was Todd Earnshaw. Earnshaw was indicted along with Miller and others in what is commonly referred to as 'Miller I'. That trial is scheduled to begin on January 11, 2010 in Topeka, Kansas.



More Trial Coverage

What's Your Opinion?

ORDER NOW!!

Blog Roll

TopOfBlogsReal Estate BlogsBlog Flux DirectoryBlog Directory & Search engineBlog Directory
Blogarama - The Blog DirectoryListed on BlogShares

© Copyright 2004-2009 Rachel M. Dollar

Legal Disclaimer.
The information and notices contained on Mortgage Fraud Blog are intended to summarize recent developments in mortgage fraud cases and mortgage banking matters nationwide. The posts on this site are presented as general research and information and are expressly not intended, and should not be regarded, as legal advice. Much of the information on this site concerns allegations made in civil lawsuits and in criminal indictments. All persons are presumed innocent until convicted of a crime. Readers who have particular questions about mortgage banking, mortgage fraud matters or who believe they require legal counsel should seek the advice of an attorney. The creators, editors and sponsors of Mortgage Fraud Blog do not intend to create a confidential relationship or an attorney-client relationship by communication via or arising from this site.

TopOfBlogs Real Estate Blogs Blog Flux Directory Blog Directory & Search engine Blog Directory
Blogarama - The Blog Directory Listed on BlogShares