Friday, June 06, 2008
Leader Of Foreclosure Scheme And Mortgage Broker Plead Guilty
Maurice McDowall, 49, and Aleksander Lipkin, a/k/a ”Alex," 29, pleaded guiltyin Manhattan federal court to participating in a wide-ranging home foreclosure rescue scheme, which defrauded homeowners who were facing foreclosure and banks and other lenders who made mortgage and home equity loans. Lipkin also pleaded guilty to participating in another scheme to defraud numerous subprime mortgage lenders. As previously reported by Mortgage Fraud Blog and according to the Indictment to which both McDowall and Lipkin pleaded guilty (United States v. Maurice McDowall, et al., 07 Cr. 1054), and the superseding Indictment to which Lipkin also pleaded guilty (United States v. Aleksander Lipkin, et al., S2 06 Cr. 1179), other documents filed in the cases, and statements made during the guilty plea proceedings:
Regarding the foreclosure rescue scheme, from November 2003 through April 2005, McDowall and Lipkin engaged in a fraud scheme targeting homeowners whose homes, primarily in Brooklyn and Bronx, New York, were in foreclosure or facing foreclosure, by offering them a plan to “save” their homes. The proposed plan included the refinancing of the homeowners’ debt with new, larger mortgages. Because the distressed homeowners typically had poor credit and were not eligible to refinance their debt at favorable terms, the defendants induced them to “sell” their homes to third parties, or straw buyers, who would apply for loans to be used to “save” the home. The defendants promised that once the straw buyer obtained the mortgage, the proceeds would be used to pay off the homeowners’ old debt and make one year’s worth of payments on the new loans. The homeowners were told that, during that year, they could continue to live in their homes and work on improving their finances and credit. Finally, the defendants explained to the homeowners that, at the end of the year, the title to their homes would be returned to them by the straw buyers, with their credit repaired and their homes saved. There were also cases in which the defendants did not explain to homeowners that the plan to “save” their home required them to deed their house to a third party and did not obtain permission to deed the homes to others. In such cases, the defendants effectively stole the property of the homeowners by forging the homeowners’ signatures on various documents that transferred the homes to straw buyers without the homeowners’ knowledge.
In furtherance of the scheme, McDowall and Lipkin submitted loan applications to various banks and lending institutions on the straw buyer’s behalf. In submitting these applications, the defendants regularly used documents containing false or misleading information, including information concerning the straw buyer’s income, assets, and existing debt, to improve the straw buyer’s credit-worthiness. In addition to false statements concerning the straw buyers’ financial profile, the defendants misrepresented to lenders that the straw buyers intended to reside in the property that would secure each mortgage or loan, when, in fact, the properties were already occupied by the distressed homeowners.
McDowall, who directed the daily operations of the scheme, and Lipkin, a mortgage broker who coordinated the submission of fraudulent information to lenders on behalf of straw buyers, obtained more than eighty home mortgages and/or equity loans valued at over $20 million. In some instances, the defendants failed to make even one payment on the loans, causing the loans to default immediately; in nearly every other case, they eventually failed to make the payments and defaulted on the loans, thereby “cashing out” on the properties. As a result, the distressed homeowners lost the titles to their homes and faced eviction, the straw buyers owed the lenders hundreds of thousands of dollars that they were unable to repay, and the lenders suffered losses from the defaulted loans.
The defendants’ profit consisted of the difference between the value of the new and old loans; they also earned at least $1.4 million in fees.
Regarding the subprime scheme, from 2004 through January 2007, Lipkin participated in a scheme to defraud various subprime banks and lending institutions. Lipkin conspired with other mortgage brokers and processors who worked at the mortgage brokerages AGA Capital NY, Inc. (”AGA Capital”) and Northside Capital NY, Inc. (”Northside Capital”), in Brooklyn, as well as with real estate appraisers, loan account executives, a paralegal, a lawyer, straw buyers, and others. Lipkin and his co-defendants submitted loan applications and supporting documents with false information and material omissions, as well as other false documentation such as bank statements, to subprime lenders in order to induce the lenders to make loans that otherwise would not have been funded. In some instances, the conspirators obtained mortgages in the names of persons whose identities had been stolen. During the course of this scheme, AGA Capital, its successor, Lending Universe Corporation, and Northside Capital brokered over one thousand home mortgages and home equity loans with a total face value of at least $200 million dollars. AGA Capital, Lending Universe and Northside Capital earned a total of at least $4 million in commission fees on the loans. The subprime lenders that issued the mortgages and loans brokered by Northside Capital, AGA Capital and Lending Universe have suffered actual losses of at least $4.5 million as a result of the fraud scheme.
McDowall pleaded guilty before United States District Judge Rpbert P. Patterson, and Lipkin pleaded guilty before United States District Judge Richard J. Holwell.
McDowall pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit bank and wire fraud. He faces a maximum prison term of thirty years and a maximum fine of the greater of $1 million or twice the gross pecuniary gain or loss resulting from the crime, and he must pay restitution to the victims of his crime. In addition, McDowall also agreed to forfeit a total of $2.5 million. He is scheduled to be sentenced by Judge Patterson on September 9, 2008.
Lipkin pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit mail, wire and bank fraud. He faces a maximum prison term of thirty years and a maximum fine of the greater of $1 million or twice the gross pecuniary gain or loss resulting from the crime, and he must pay restitution to the victims of his crime. Lipkin also agreed to forfeit a total of $7 million. He is scheduled to be sentenced by Judge HOLWELL on October 10, 2008.
Of the four other defendants charged in United States v. Maurice McDowall, et al., one has pleaded guilty and the rest await trial, which is scheduled for June 23, 2008. As to the defendants awaiting trial, the charges are merely accusations, and the defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty. Of the 26 other defendants charged in United States v. Aleksander Lipkin, et al., four have pleaded guilty and the rest await trial, which is scheduled for November 17, 2008. As to the latter group, the charges are merely accusations, and the defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.
Mr. Garcia praised the efforts of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, New York City Police Department, and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. He also thanked the New York State Attorney General’s Office for its outstanding work in the investigation.
Assistant United States Attorneys Katherine R. Goldstein and Jonathan B. New are in charge of the prosecution.
mortgage fraud
No, they can’t, because your other home is not collateral to the loan that was foreclosed on.What they can do is get a court order to garnish your wages.
Posted by on 06/08 at 07:15 PM
i know someone who does a lot of mortgage and real estate fraud. How can i report them. i have evidence of fake bank statements and pay studs. i found out exactly how they do everything. please help me do the right thing
Posted by on 06/09 at 01:36 AM
It is guys like this that give the good mortgage lenders a bad rap. I say, throw the key away!
Posted by on 06/09 at 03:14 PM
May of 2006, we sold our home to a man who was a Real estate broker and also a managing member of E&M;Investment group LLC. He told us because our home was in Forclosure we would have to place it in a land trust,so that no other leins or judgements could be placed against it till closeing, and we needed give him a limited power of attorney, plus sign a warranty deed....Now 2 years later we get Forclosure papers and He owns our house! Remax has it up for sale with this mans business partner as owner...We have contacted the Attorney Generals office...and the mortage company....I went threw public records and seen where they have done this to quite a few people in this county and the county their investment group is in....Can anyone else help us?? Thank you
Posted by on 06/17 at 10:58 AM
The Mortgage Broker industry is cleaning out the bad apples. California and everyone else will be much better off.
Posted by on 08/01 at 09:17 PM
Post a Comment
The trackback URL for this entry is:
Trackbacks:
|
Some Sources require Registration.
Mortgage Scam Ends with Prison
The Morning Call
A judge didn't hold back when Shirley Matthews appeared before him Tuesday to be sentenced for stealing from a Monroe County man instead of helping him save his home from foreclosure, as she was hired to do.
Woman Gets Prison Time After Mortgage Scam Conviction
Pocono Record
A New Jersey woman will be spending two to five years in state prison after she was sentenced on Tuesday for promising to help homeowners avoid foreclosure and then keeping the money she was given for their mortgages.
2 Indicted in Mortgage Scam Face New Charges
Newsday.Com
Prosecutors add extra charges to two who are charged in LI mortgage fraud with county legislator, dominatrix and her husband
Untangling Mortgage Fraud in Chicago Condo Buildings
Chicago Public Radio
Why did so many units go into foreclosure all at once? In some cases, the reason can be traced to mortgage fraud.
No Contest Plea Entered in Real Estate Fraud Case
Northbay Business Journal
Juan Carlos Alcala of Windsor pleaded no contest to nineteen felony counts and admitted three special allegations for defrauding real estate investors, money laundering and elder fraud.
Bedford Woman Sentenced to a Year in Prison for Mortgage Fraud
Plain Dealer
Sharon Cox, 49, of Bedford, was sentenced today to a year in prison for mortgage fraud involving money laundering, theft and receiving stolen property from August 2008 through March.
CITIZEN JOURNALISM: Mortgage Fraud High in Area
Washington Times
According to the FBI, Virginia, Maryland and the District are among the top 10 jurisdictions experiencing mortgage fraud.
Former Vegas Resident Charged with Mortgage Fraud in Nevada
National Mortgage Professional Magazine
A former Las Vegas resident has been charged with federal conspiracy and fraud charges for his involvement in a Nevada mortgage fraud scheme involving straw buyers and falsified mortgage loan documents...
Missouri Man Sentenced for Mortgage Fraud
Belleville News Democrat
A suburban St. Louis mortgage company operator has been sentenced to more than 11 years in prison for a mortgage fraud scheme.
12-Year Prison Term in Mortgage Swindle
Washington Post
A Maryland woman who stole millions from Washington area homeowners trying to avoid foreclosure is a "vulture" whose case should serve as a warning to other con artists...
Previous Articles
|
Trial coverage provided by Anne Mitchell, Crazy Fish Realty.
F. Jeffrey Miller Update - October 20, 2009
A hearing was held in Topeka, Kansas in front of Judge Julie Robinson. Miller is currently being held pending his sentencing which is set for December 22nd, 2009 at 9:00 a.m.. Steve Vanatta and Hallie Irvin, Miller's codefendants, will be sentenced at that time also.
Several motions were heard this week. One was a motion for Miller to be released pending his sentencing. Miller's attorney, Jeff Morris, argued that the court had dismmissed with predjudice the matter involving Miller's purchase of a commercial lawnmower, violating the court ordered monitoring agreement. He also argued that Miller was not a flight risk and should be released. This motion was denied.
Another motion heard by Judge Robinson was that of an escrow account containing proceeds from the sale of Miller's forfeited assets. This account has a balance of $143,000. Attorney Morris argued that his firm was due $100,000 for work done in the Miller matter, to date. The government argued that his 'un-itemized fees' were 'exhorbitant'. The balance of the funds, Morris argued, should be released to the Miller family to help pay for mounting household expenses.
The government argued that the 'Asset Forfeiture Provision' applies down to 'the last penny' and that 'the rights of the victims to made whole are of paramount immportance' and that no routine household expenses like Visa bills, are allowed.
Attorney Morris argues that there is more than enough assets to satisfy the jury's judgement of $2.65 million dollars. The government argues that the estimated value of his assets are only $1.4 million.
The government also stated that Miller has been paid dividends from a company Miller has an ownership interest in; Boreflex. From July, 2008 to present, Miller has been paid $330,509.30 from Boreflex, unbeknownst to the court appointed monitor.
Present in the courtroom was Todd Earnshaw. Earnshaw was indicted along with Miller and others in what is commonly referred to as 'Miller I'. That trial is scheduled to begin on January 11, 2010 in Topeka, Kansas.
More Trial Coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|