Thursday, November 05, 2009
Maryland Woman Pleads Guilty to Mortgage Fraud Scheme in D.C. and Maryland
Rasheeda M. Canty, 35, Upper Marlboro, Maryland, a former mortgage broker, pled guilty in September 2009 to engaging in an extensive mortgage fraud scheme involving properties in the District of Columbia and Maryland.
During the plea hearing, Canty admitted that the intended loss to victims of the scheme was over $1,000,000. Canty agreed to a forfeiture Order requiring her to pay the government $342,572, which represents the amount of commissions she received from lenders on the fraudulent transactions. Canty faces up to 30 years in prison under the federal fraud statute when sentenced next year, but likely will face 41-51 months of imprisonment under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.
According to the Statement of Offense filed by the government, to which Canty agreed, at all relevant times Canty was a mortgage broker with an office in Lanham, Maryland. As part of her job duties, Canty completed and filed, often by mail or interstate wire transactions, loan applications to financial institutions on behalf of individuals involved in real estate transactions.
Starting in approximately June of 2005, Canty and others conspired to defraud financial institutions whose deposits were insured by the FDIC for the purpose of influencing the financial institutions to approve mortgage loans. Canty and other conspirators perpetrated this scheme by identifying distressed homeowners whose properties in Washington, D.C. and Maryland were facing imminent foreclosure and offering to purchase their properties. The conspirators told some of the homeowners that they could repurchase their properties within one year.
Canty prepared fraudulent letters to have derogatory information deleted from the sellers' credit reports so that their credit scores would be increased, thus allowing the sellers to qualify for the repurchase of their properties. The conspirators would then seek out unsophisticated individuals, with good credit scores or credit scores that could be fraudulently raised, to act as "straw purchasers," also known as "credit partners," for these transactions, often in exchange for a $5,000 to $10,000 fee to the straw purchaser for the use of his or her personal information to purchase the respective property. The straw purchasers understood that one of the conspirators would make the monthly mortgage payments, and the straw purchaser would not be otherwise financially responsible for the property or required to live there. On some occasions, the conspirators would use the identification of innocent, unknowing victims to make these purchases.
In furtherance of the conspiracy, Canty obtained financial information from the straw purchasers which she then falsified in order to qualify the applicants for their mortgage loans. Primarily, Canty inflated the straw purchaser's income, so it would decrease the debt-to-income ratio for a more favorable rate and loan approval. Based upon her experience, Canty knew the significance of debt to income ratio on a borrower's ability to obtain high mortgage loans. Canty knowingly falsified the loan applications in a number of ways, including, among others:
- (a) inflating the gross income of the applicant;
- (b) falsifying, often with fraudulent documents obtained from other conspirator, the job position of the applicant;
- (c) failing to report the applicant's financial obligations, such as child support;
- (d) falsifying rental verification documents;
- (e) failing to report personal bankruptcies filed; and
- (f) falsely reporting that the straw purchasers intended to occupy the properties as their primary residences.
In the course of this scheme, Canty obtained loans from at least eleven lenders to which she had knowingly submitted fraudulent information. Canty benefitted from these transactions by charging a large fee, usually five percentage points of the purchase price, on these transactions. Her commissions from lenders to which she had
submitted fraudulent information were approximately $342,572.00. The conspirators benefitted from this scheme, in among other ways, by skimming equity from the properties, often after inflating the appraisals, and charging excessive brokerage fees. As a result of these transactions, several of the properties have gone into foreclosure.
In response to Canty's plea, Joseph Persichini, Jr., Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI's Washington Field Office, stated that:
"The successful conclusion of this important investigation should send a clear message to bad actors in the District's real estate and mortgage business community that law enforcement has united to address the crime problem of mortgage fraud. There is no safe harbor for criminals in this business. Federal agencies have joined with the Metropolitan Police Department to form a regional mortgage fraud task force and step up efforts to eradicate fraud within the region's real estate and mortgage industries. Today's result is emblematic of the impact this collaboration will have in our community."
mortgage fraud
Thanks for your great info. If you want to be a freelance writer, you can join Freelancer.com. Use this code PLANVIEW to get more advantages from the site. Thanks
Posted by on 11/12 at 02:44 AM
Post a Comment
The trackback URL for this entry is:
Trackbacks:
|
Some Sources require Registration.
Mortgage Scam Ends with Prison
The Morning Call
A judge didn't hold back when Shirley Matthews appeared before him Tuesday to be sentenced for stealing from a Monroe County man instead of helping him save his home from foreclosure, as she was hired to do.
Woman Gets Prison Time After Mortgage Scam Conviction
Pocono Record
A New Jersey woman will be spending two to five years in state prison after she was sentenced on Tuesday for promising to help homeowners avoid foreclosure and then keeping the money she was given for their mortgages.
2 Indicted in Mortgage Scam Face New Charges
Newsday.Com
Prosecutors add extra charges to two who are charged in LI mortgage fraud with county legislator, dominatrix and her husband
Untangling Mortgage Fraud in Chicago Condo Buildings
Chicago Public Radio
Why did so many units go into foreclosure all at once? In some cases, the reason can be traced to mortgage fraud.
No Contest Plea Entered in Real Estate Fraud Case
Northbay Business Journal
Juan Carlos Alcala of Windsor pleaded no contest to nineteen felony counts and admitted three special allegations for defrauding real estate investors, money laundering and elder fraud.
Bedford Woman Sentenced to a Year in Prison for Mortgage Fraud
Plain Dealer
Sharon Cox, 49, of Bedford, was sentenced today to a year in prison for mortgage fraud involving money laundering, theft and receiving stolen property from August 2008 through March.
CITIZEN JOURNALISM: Mortgage Fraud High in Area
Washington Times
According to the FBI, Virginia, Maryland and the District are among the top 10 jurisdictions experiencing mortgage fraud.
Former Vegas Resident Charged with Mortgage Fraud in Nevada
National Mortgage Professional Magazine
A former Las Vegas resident has been charged with federal conspiracy and fraud charges for his involvement in a Nevada mortgage fraud scheme involving straw buyers and falsified mortgage loan documents...
Missouri Man Sentenced for Mortgage Fraud
Belleville News Democrat
A suburban St. Louis mortgage company operator has been sentenced to more than 11 years in prison for a mortgage fraud scheme.
12-Year Prison Term in Mortgage Swindle
Washington Post
A Maryland woman who stole millions from Washington area homeowners trying to avoid foreclosure is a "vulture" whose case should serve as a warning to other con artists...
Previous Articles
|
Trial coverage provided by Anne Mitchell, Crazy Fish Realty.
F. Jeffrey Miller Update - October 20, 2009
A hearing was held in Topeka, Kansas in front of Judge Julie Robinson. Miller is currently being held pending his sentencing which is set for December 22nd, 2009 at 9:00 a.m.. Steve Vanatta and Hallie Irvin, Miller's codefendants, will be sentenced at that time also.
Several motions were heard this week. One was a motion for Miller to be released pending his sentencing. Miller's attorney, Jeff Morris, argued that the court had dismmissed with predjudice the matter involving Miller's purchase of a commercial lawnmower, violating the court ordered monitoring agreement. He also argued that Miller was not a flight risk and should be released. This motion was denied.
Another motion heard by Judge Robinson was that of an escrow account containing proceeds from the sale of Miller's forfeited assets. This account has a balance of $143,000. Attorney Morris argued that his firm was due $100,000 for work done in the Miller matter, to date. The government argued that his 'un-itemized fees' were 'exhorbitant'. The balance of the funds, Morris argued, should be released to the Miller family to help pay for mounting household expenses.
The government argued that the 'Asset Forfeiture Provision' applies down to 'the last penny' and that 'the rights of the victims to made whole are of paramount immportance' and that no routine household expenses like Visa bills, are allowed.
Attorney Morris argues that there is more than enough assets to satisfy the jury's judgement of $2.65 million dollars. The government argues that the estimated value of his assets are only $1.4 million.
The government also stated that Miller has been paid dividends from a company Miller has an ownership interest in; Boreflex. From July, 2008 to present, Miller has been paid $330,509.30 from Boreflex, unbeknownst to the court appointed monitor.
Present in the courtroom was Todd Earnshaw. Earnshaw was indicted along with Miller and others in what is commonly referred to as 'Miller I'. That trial is scheduled to begin on January 11, 2010 in Topeka, Kansas.
More Trial Coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|