Tuesday, November 11, 2008
Jury Convicts Multiple NY Defendants Of Fraud
Ronald Persaud, 55, Esther Persaud, 50, and Shawn Persaud, 24, Saratoga, New York, were convicted on Monday, November 10, 2008, following a jury trial before the Honorable Thomas J. McAvoy, Senior United States District Judge.
Ronald and Esther Persaud were each convicted of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 371, and twelve counts of substantive wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343. The former count carries a five-year maximum term of imprisonment; the latter counts each carry a twenty-year maximum term of imprisonment. Ronald and Esther Persaud were each acquitted of one count of wire fraud involving a $5,500 payment to convicted codefendant Philip Rechnitzer.
Ronald, Esther and Shawn Persaud were each convicted of conspiracy to launder monetary instruments, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1956(h). That section carries a twenty-year maximum term of imprisonment.
Ronald Persaud was convicted of two counts of mail fraud in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1341. Each count carries a twenty-year maximum term of imprisonment. In substance, the evidence at trial showed that Ronald and convicted defendant Indranie Persaud perpetuated a scheme to inflate the latter’s employment income on a mortgage application to obtain a $712,000 mortgage to obtain a real property known as 12 Beacon Hill, Saratoga Springs, New York.
The evidence at trial also showed that defendants Ronald and Esther Persaud perpetrated a wire fraud conspiracy by enticing investors to pay advance fees on the false promise that the investors would receive millions of dollars in commercial funding. The investors made advance fee payments in excess of $1 million and received no commercial funding. Ronald Persaud purported to be the person with banking connections, Esther Persaud purported to be a bank executive. Ronald, Esther and Shawn Persaud then conspired to conduct a series of financial transactions calculated to conceal and disguise the source, ownership and control of the advance fees paid to the Persauds and others.
Esther Persaud was also convicted of one count of making a false statement under oath at a bankruptcy hearing, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 152. The bankruptcy count carries a five-year maximum term of imprisonment. In substance, the evidence at trial showed that Esther Persaud made a false statement to a bankruptcy trustee that included that she had no bank accounts, when , in fact, Esther Persaud did have bank accounts.
Following the jury’s verdict, Ronald Persaud remanded into custody.
Additionally, all defendants are subject to periods of supervised release following incarceration, as well as fines, restitution, asset forfeiture and a special assessment. All are scheduled to be sentenced March 9, 2009.
mortgage fraud
Post a Comment
The trackback URL for this entry is:
Trackbacks:
|
Some Sources require Registration.
Mortgage Scam Ends with Prison
The Morning Call
A judge didn't hold back when Shirley Matthews appeared before him Tuesday to be sentenced for stealing from a Monroe County man instead of helping him save his home from foreclosure, as she was hired to do.
Woman Gets Prison Time After Mortgage Scam Conviction
Pocono Record
A New Jersey woman will be spending two to five years in state prison after she was sentenced on Tuesday for promising to help homeowners avoid foreclosure and then keeping the money she was given for their mortgages.
2 Indicted in Mortgage Scam Face New Charges
Newsday.Com
Prosecutors add extra charges to two who are charged in LI mortgage fraud with county legislator, dominatrix and her husband
Untangling Mortgage Fraud in Chicago Condo Buildings
Chicago Public Radio
Why did so many units go into foreclosure all at once? In some cases, the reason can be traced to mortgage fraud.
No Contest Plea Entered in Real Estate Fraud Case
Northbay Business Journal
Juan Carlos Alcala of Windsor pleaded no contest to nineteen felony counts and admitted three special allegations for defrauding real estate investors, money laundering and elder fraud.
Bedford Woman Sentenced to a Year in Prison for Mortgage Fraud
Plain Dealer
Sharon Cox, 49, of Bedford, was sentenced today to a year in prison for mortgage fraud involving money laundering, theft and receiving stolen property from August 2008 through March.
CITIZEN JOURNALISM: Mortgage Fraud High in Area
Washington Times
According to the FBI, Virginia, Maryland and the District are among the top 10 jurisdictions experiencing mortgage fraud.
Former Vegas Resident Charged with Mortgage Fraud in Nevada
National Mortgage Professional Magazine
A former Las Vegas resident has been charged with federal conspiracy and fraud charges for his involvement in a Nevada mortgage fraud scheme involving straw buyers and falsified mortgage loan documents...
Missouri Man Sentenced for Mortgage Fraud
Belleville News Democrat
A suburban St. Louis mortgage company operator has been sentenced to more than 11 years in prison for a mortgage fraud scheme.
12-Year Prison Term in Mortgage Swindle
Washington Post
A Maryland woman who stole millions from Washington area homeowners trying to avoid foreclosure is a "vulture" whose case should serve as a warning to other con artists...
Previous Articles
|
Trial coverage provided by Anne Mitchell, Crazy Fish Realty.
F. Jeffrey Miller Update - October 20, 2009
A hearing was held in Topeka, Kansas in front of Judge Julie Robinson. Miller is currently being held pending his sentencing which is set for December 22nd, 2009 at 9:00 a.m.. Steve Vanatta and Hallie Irvin, Miller's codefendants, will be sentenced at that time also.
Several motions were heard this week. One was a motion for Miller to be released pending his sentencing. Miller's attorney, Jeff Morris, argued that the court had dismmissed with predjudice the matter involving Miller's purchase of a commercial lawnmower, violating the court ordered monitoring agreement. He also argued that Miller was not a flight risk and should be released. This motion was denied.
Another motion heard by Judge Robinson was that of an escrow account containing proceeds from the sale of Miller's forfeited assets. This account has a balance of $143,000. Attorney Morris argued that his firm was due $100,000 for work done in the Miller matter, to date. The government argued that his 'un-itemized fees' were 'exhorbitant'. The balance of the funds, Morris argued, should be released to the Miller family to help pay for mounting household expenses.
The government argued that the 'Asset Forfeiture Provision' applies down to 'the last penny' and that 'the rights of the victims to made whole are of paramount immportance' and that no routine household expenses like Visa bills, are allowed.
Attorney Morris argues that there is more than enough assets to satisfy the jury's judgement of $2.65 million dollars. The government argues that the estimated value of his assets are only $1.4 million.
The government also stated that Miller has been paid dividends from a company Miller has an ownership interest in; Boreflex. From July, 2008 to present, Miller has been paid $330,509.30 from Boreflex, unbeknownst to the court appointed monitor.
Present in the courtroom was Todd Earnshaw. Earnshaw was indicted along with Miller and others in what is commonly referred to as 'Miller I'. That trial is scheduled to begin on January 11, 2010 in Topeka, Kansas.
More Trial Coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|