Thursday, May 15, 2008
Sacramento Man Indicted For Multiple Schemes
Alexsandr Bernik, 29, Sacramento, California, was indicted on charges of wire fraud, money laundering, and making false statements to federally insured banks to obtain real estate loans. Bernik was previously arrested on April 30, 2008, on a criminal complaint filed in connection with this investigation and was ordered detained as a flight risk.
According to Assistant United States Attorney Courtney J. Linn, who is prosecuting the case, the indictment charges that in late 2005, Bernik applied for and obtained loans from federally insured lenders secured by residential real property in the Sacramento, California area. In connection with those loans, the indictment charges that Bernik knowingly made false statements overstating his income and knowingly submitted false bank statements to influence the banks to loan him money.
The indictment further charges that from October 2005 through November 2006, Berniki engaged in a scheme to defraud American Express and its customers. He used the fictitious business name Lexbay Limited to open a bank account and establish a merchant relationship with American Express. Between August 2006 and November 2006, he fraudulently charged American Express customers for products or services that the customers did not order. During this time period, a bank account he controlled in the name of Lexbay Limited received approximately $177,000 from American Express. Some of those funds were then withdrawn in transactions designed in part to avoid transaction reporting requirements under state and federal law.
The maximum penalties for wire fraud is 20 years in prison, and a fine of up to $250,000. The maximum penalty for money laundering is 20 years in prison and a fine of up to $500,000. The maximum penalty for making false statements to a federally insured lender is 30 years in prison and a fine of not more than $1,000,000. The actual sentence, however, will be determined at the discretion of the court after consideration of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, which take into account a number of variables and any applicable statutory sentencing factors.
mortgage fraud
When will I ever be arrested for doing virtually the same thing?? Look up my name if you don’t know my history…
Posted by on 05/27 at 04:15 PM
Post a Comment
The trackback URL for this entry is:
Trackbacks:
|
Some Sources require Registration.
Erie Area Mortgage Broker Gets Prison in Fraud Case
GoErie.com - Erie, PA
Shortly before receiving a nearly three-year federal prison sentence, former mortgage office manager Francis R. Conti told the judge he never meant to defraud any of the homeowners caught up in a widespread local mortgage-fraud scheme.
Three Former Portland-Area Mortgage Brokers Face Fraud Charges
OregonLive.com - Portland, OR
Joel D. Surprenant, Michael Duc Han and Benjamin Lucian Lucescu all were charged with one count of obtaining mortgage loans through materially false and fraudulent pretenses.
Shaker Pair Pleads Guilty to Mortgage Fraud Charges
Cleveland.com - Cleveland, OH
Two Shaker Heights residents recently pleaded guilty to charges involving a mortgage scheme with seven area houses and $3 million in fraudulent loans.
Feds File Charges in Five Mortgage Fraud Cases
Chicago Breaking News - Tribune - Chicago, IL
Federal charges were filed today against 37 people and four companies in five separate mortgage fraud cases.
Feds Fighting Back
Contra Costa Times - Walnut Creek, CA
Mortgage fraud has increased so dramatically in the San Joaquin Valley that a task force of federal, state and local agencies has been formed to fight back.
Private Investigator Sees Rise in Mortgage Fraud Due to Economy
PR Web - Ferndale, WA
In the past 12 months his firm has been retained to conduct over 300 mortgage fraud investigations, a 100% increase from 2007.
Former UGA, NFL Football Player Arthur Marshall Charged With Mortgage Fraud Claims
WJBF-TV - Augusta, GA
He is also accused of defrauding three banks in obtaining loans for seven different properties in Columbia and Richmond Counties.
Cuomo Subpoenas Loan Modification Companies
New York Times - United States
“The entire industry is a scam, in my opinion,” Mr. Cuomo said Tuesday. “These are services that homeowners don’t need to pay for in the first place.”
Defendant Pleads Guilty to Wire Fraud Relating to Mortgage Fraud Scheme
Imperial Valley News - Holtville, CA
Scavitti admitted that between 2003 and August 2008 he unlawfully diverted mortgage funds that were wire transferred into his client office account to his own personal benefit, resulting in losses in excess of $2.5 million.
Fed Drug Report: Double Trouble for Metro Chicago
ABC7Chicago.com - IL
...Chicago street gang members run a network of legitimate businesses and have engineered mortgage fraud schemes, both to launder drug proceeds...
Previous Articles
|
Trial coverage provided by Anne Mitchell, Crazy Fish Realty.
Update - US v. F. Jeffrey Miller, et al.
Miller II: Judge Julie Robinson has ruled in favor of the defense motion granting a continuance for sentencing of the 3 convicted defendants: F. Jeffrey Miller, Steve Vanatta and Hallie Irvin. The three will now be sentenced after ruling on post trial motions set for August 10, 2009.
Vanatta has been in custody for over 2 years. Vanetta filed a motion for his release pending sentencing. That motion was denied.
Miller remains free pending his sentencing. He has hired a new attorney who filed a motion to delay Miller's sentencing. In one post trial motion, the defense argues as to what assets are subject to seizure.
Defendant Todd Earnshaw is a Kansas City real estate Broker (and brother in law of Miller). Earnshaw has been indicted in what is commonly referred to as Miller I. A trial date for that matter has been set for January, 2010 in Topeka, Kansas.
The Government filed a motion to revoke Earnshaw's bond and remand him to custody while he awaits trial after learning that he allegedly committed the state crimes of Driving Under the Influence, Handicap Parking Violation and Failure to Control Speed to Avoid a Collision while on pretrial release. Notwithstanding finding that probable cause existed to believe that Earnshaw committed the aforementioned state crimes, Judge Robinson denied the motion, but ordered several strict conditions that Earnshaw must follow pending his trial.
More Trial Coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|