Search Results For "new york"

Lawsuits have been filed against 17 financial institutions, certain of their officers and various unaffiliated lead underwriters. The suits allege violations of federal securities laws and common law in the sale of residential private-label mortgage-backed securities (PLS) to the Enterprises.

Complaints have been filed against the following lead defendants, in alphabetical order:

1. Ally Financial Inc. f/k/a GMAC, LLC

2. Bank of America Corporation

3. Barclays Bank PLC

4. Citigroup, Inc.

5. Countrywide Financial Corporation

6. Credit Suisse Holdings (USA), Inc.

7. Deutsche Bank AG

8. First Horizon National Corporation

9. General Electric Company

10. Goldman Sachs & Co.

11. HSBC North America Holdings, Inc.

12. JPMorgan Chase & Co.

13. Merrill Lynch & Co. / First Franklin Financial Corp.

14. Morgan Stanley

15. Nomura Holding America Inc.

16. The Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC

17. Société Générale

The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), as conservator for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (the Enterprises) filed the lawsuits. These complaints were filed in federal or state court in New York or the federal court in Connecticut. The complaints seek damages and civil penalties under the Securities Act of 1933, similar in content to the complaint FHFA filed against UBS Americas, Inc. on July 27, 2011. In addition, each complaint seeks compensatory damages for negligent misrepresentation. Certain complaints also allege state securities law violations or common law fraud.

As conservator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, FHFA is charged with preserving and conserving these companies’ assets and does so on behalf of taxpayers. The complaints filed today reflect FHFA’s conclusion that some portion of the losses that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac incurred on private-label mortgage-backed securities (PLS) are attributable to misrepresentations and other improper actions by the firms and individuals named in these filings. Based on our review, FHFA alleges that the loans had different and more risky characteristics than the descriptions contained in the marketing and sales materials provided to the Enterprises for those securities.

FHFA filed the complaints under the broad authority granted to it by the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008. The U.S. legal system provides for addressing such alleged misrepresentations through the nation’s securities laws and traditional common law. FHFA is following those legal remedies in filing these complaints and seeks to recover on losses to the Enterprises that are the legal responsibilities of others.

Discussions regarding these matters have taken place with several of the firms receiving complaints and, where constructive, they will continue.

 

The Federal Housing Finance Agency regulates Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the 12 Federal Home Loan Banks. These government-sponsored enterprises provide more than $5.7 trillion in funding for the U.S. mortgage markets and financial institutions

James Andrew Lawyer, 30, Utah County, Utah, will be sentenced Oct. 26, 2011, in U.S. District Court in Salt Lake City after pleading guilty to conspiracy in connection with a mortgage fraud scheme involving the purchase of a home in Highland, Utah.

In court documents, Lawyer admitted he conspired with an individual identified as B.G. and at least one other person to commit wire fraud or money laundering or both offenses.

In a plea agreement reached with federal prosecutors, Lawyer admitted that he was approached by B.G. to use his name to purchase a residence at 5843 W. Avonmore, Highland, UtahLawyer said B.G. told him on several occasions that he would receive approximately $250,000 at the time of closing as compensation.

Lawyer admitted that at the time he closed on the property, he knew that the original sellers of the property had sold it for substantially less than $975,000. According to the Felony Information, a co-conspirator in the case had offered to purchase the home for $680,000.

Despite knowing that, Lawyer applied for two residential loans totaling $975,000 to purchase the property and proceeded to closing. On the loan applications, which Lawyer signed, he represented that the sales price of the property was $975,000. On Sept. 13, 2006, two wire transfers funding these loans were sent from New York to Utah.

Lawyer admitted that as a result of the loans he obtained and the property he purchased, $295,000 was transferred by the title company as a “JVA pmt. to Portia, Inc.” According to the plea agreement, B.G. transferred $247,000 of this amount to Lawyer‘s bank account on Sept. 15, 2006.

As a part of the plea agreement, federal prosecutors agreed not to file additional criminal charges relative to Lawyer‘s activities with other properties in Pleasant Grove and Heber City, Utah. However, Lawyer stipulated that for sentencing and restitution purposes, the final loss amount in his case will include losses from his loans on those properties.

Lawyer faces up to five years in prison and a fine of $250,000 for the conspiracy conviction when he is sentenced in October 2011. The case is being investigated by IRS Criminal Investigation and FBI special agents.

Demerara WavesOzone Park, Queens-based broker Edul Ahmad was indicted in a $50 million mortgage fraud scheme, the US Attorney’s office announced today. Ahmad, who is a licensed real estate broker with Ahmad Realty, also allegedly acted as a loan officer and …Real Estate Agent Indicted in $50 Million Mortgage Fraud Scheme Federal Bureau of Investigation (press release)US Grand Jury indicts Ahmad Stabroek Newsall 5 news articles »

Click here for full article
Source: The Real Deal New York (blog)

Globe and MailS&P in US mortgage fraud probeToronto SunWASHINGTON – The US Justice Department is investigating whether Standard & Poor’s improperly rated dozens of mortgage securities in the years before the financial crisis, The New York Times reported on Wednesday, citing sources familiar with the matter …Feds Investigating Standard & Poor’s for Mortgage Fraud Gather.comS&P probed over mortgage bond ratings, sources say Sacramento BeeJustice Department Investigating Standard & Poor’s The Atlantic Wire cbs4qc.com  - Boston Globeall 869 news articles »

Click here for full article
Source: Toronto Sun

San Francisco ExaminerAccording to the FBI’s Mortgage Fraud Report, mortgage fraud persisted at “elevated levels” during 2010. And things are not likely to improve, says the bureau, as long as market remains in its current condition. “The current housing market will likely …FBI Reports Show Mortgage Fraud on the Rise ticklethewire.comMortgage Fraud Is Rising and Resilient, Says FBI Reverse Mortgage DailyMortgages: Fraud grows as economy stumbles Christian Science Monitor New York Daily News  - Federal Bureau of Investigation (press release)  - CNN Internationalall 292 news articles »

Click here for full article
Source: Bryan Ellis Real Estate Letter

The Star-Ledger – NJ.comMortgage fraud saw continued elevated levels in 2010, sustained from 2009, says the latest FBI report on mortgage fraud. Reverse mortgages are included among the prevalent mortgage fraud schemes reported, with Fannie Mae reporting that current reverse …Mortgages: Fraud grows as economy stumbles Christian Science MonitorMortgage fraud hits New York City hard as economy tanks and home scams rise New York Daily NewsDespite government efforts, FBI says no let up in mortgage fraud CNN International BusinessWeek  - USA Today  - San Francisco Examinerall 289 news articles »

Click here for full article
Source: Reverse Mortgage Daily

Dunwell Financial Services, LLC – Jersey City, New Jersey; Home Mitigation Group, Matawan, New Jersey; Loss Mitigation Consultant Services, Paulsboro, New Jersey; Rose MM, LLC, Newark, New Jersey; Save Americas Mortgages Corp., Fort Lee, New Jersey; TWI Corp., Winter Garden, Florida; and Continental Associates, Ltd., Commack, New York, are the subject of administrative actions filed for illegally offering mortgage modification services to homeowners in dire financial straits.

Continuing the State’s on-going efforts to thwart fraudulent “mortgage loan modification” enterprises, Attorney General Paula T. Dow and the State Division of Consumer Affairs filed administrative actions against seven businesses for illegally offering mortgage modification services to homeowners in dire financial straits. State law requires that anyone providing these services in New Jersey be licensed as a Debt Adjuster by the Department of Banking and Insurance, or be otherwise authorized.

The Division of Consumer Affairs filed Notices of Violation against the illegitimate businesses, which offered mortgage loan modification services even though they were not licensed to do so in New Jersey. The State is seeking $35,000 in civil penalties and $49,434 in consumer restitution from the companies. The amounts sought in consumer restitution represent the fees paid by approximately 10 consumers for mortgage loan modification services.

The Notices of Violation also provide that the companies, cited for violating the state’s Consumer Fraud Act and Debt Adjustment and Credit Counseling Act, must cease and desist from offering debt adjustment services. The companies have the option of contesting the Notice of Violation and requesting a hearing.

“We do not want homeowners who are already struggling to make mortgage payments victimized by unlicensed persons offering services that they cannot lawfully provide,” Attorney General Dow said. “Unlicensed companies most often make a difficult situation worse for homeowners, and we will continue to go after these firms.”

Thomas R. Calcagni, Director of the State Division of Consumer Affairs, said that the violations were filed as part of the Division’s ongoing initiative to crack down on mortgage modification businesses operating outside the law.

“Since the Division began this initiative earlier this year, we have taken action against 18 unlawful mortgage modification outfits,” said Calcagni. “So long as illegal mortgage modification businesses continue to ignore our laws and take advantage of financially-strapped New Jersey homeowners, we will continue to hold those businesses and their principals accountable. Our aggressive enforcement of these illegal enterprises continues.”

Calcagni noted that the Division of Consumer Affairs created its Financial Fraud Unit, within its newly reorganized Office of Consumer Protection, specifically to focus on mortgage-related frauds that prey on the hopes and fears of homeowners struggling amid financial hardship, and desperate to keep their homes. In March 2011, the Financial Fraud Unit filed Notices of Violation against 11 fraudulent mortgage loan modification providers, seeking a total of $126,000 in consumer restitution and $55,000 in civil penalties (see the March 9 press release, www.NJConsumerAffairs.gov/press/ncpw_mortgage.htm).

In the past year, the Division has recovered more than $2.2 million in actual restitution dollars for desperate New Jersey homeowners who had been victimized by predatory mortgage practices and mortgage-related scams.

The seven companies served with a Notice of Violation are:

  • Dunwell Financial Services, LLC – Jersey City
  • Home Mitigation Group – Matawan
  • Loss Mitigation Consultant Services – Paulsboro
  • Rose MM, LLC – Newark
  • Save Americas Mortgages Corp. – Fort Lee
  • TWI Corp. – Winter Garden, Fla.
  • Continental Associates, Ltd. – Commack, N.Y.

A mortgage loan modification involves changing the terms of an existing loan ““ for example, by lowering the monthly payments, adjusting the interest rate, extending the length of the loan, or in some cases decreasing the unpaid balance.

The only types of business that can engage in mortgage loan modification services in New Jersey are:

  • Nonprofit organizations licensed as Debt Adjusters by the State Department of Banking and Insurance;
  • The lender or owner of the loan;
  • The mortgage servicer acting on the lender or owner’s behalf; or
  • An attorney, provided he or she is not primarily engaged in debt adjustment.

The Department of Banking and Insurance provides a complete listing of all licensed Debt Adjusters in New Jersey at www.state.nj.us/dobi/division_consumers/finance/counselors.html

To help consumers learn about more about avoiding mortgage-related scams, and how to obtain genuine assistance, the Division of Consumer Affairs has written a consumer brief that can be viewed at www.NJConsumerAffairs.gov/brief/mortgage.pdf .

Investigator Kevin Noland, of the Mortgage/Financial Fraud Unit within the Division’s Office of Consumer Protection conducted the investigations of these companies. Deputy Attorney General Lorraine K. Rak, Chief of the Consumer Fraud Prosecution Section, provided legal counsel.

Consumers who believe they have been cheated or scammed by a business, or suspect any other form of consumer abuse, can file a complaint with the State Division of Consumer Affairs by visiting its website, www.NJConsumerAffairs.gov, or by calling 1-800-242-5846 (toll free within New Jersey) or 973-504-6200.

Kimberly K. White, 38, Elizabeth, Colorado, pled guilty before U.S. District Court Judge Robert E. Blackburn on July 15, 2011, to one count of wire fraud related to a mortgage fraud scheme. White was named in a superseding indictment  issued by a federal grand jury in Denver on May 20, 2010. White is scheduled to be sentenced by Judge Blackburn on September 30, 2011.

According to the stipulated facts contained in the plea agreement and indictment, between March 26, 2005 and June 30, 2005, Kimberly White worked with her co-defendants, Shawn Tieskotter and Craig Patterson, to execute a scheme to defraud various financial institutions as well as commercial mortgage lenders in connection with residential mortgage loan applications related to 13 properties in the Denver, Colorado metropolitan area.

As part of the scheme, Kimberly White, then a licensed real estate agent, helped Tieskotter find various residential properties available for purchase and drafted contracts for the purchase of the properties. Tieskotter and Patterson prepared and submitted applications for two loans, a first mortgage and a second mortgage, in connection with Tieskotter’s purchase of each property described in the Indictment. Each of these applications contained materially false and fraudulent representations that Tieskotter intended to use the property as his primary residence. Most of the applications also contained materially false and fraudulent representations about the extent of Tieskotter’s liabilities related to other residential mortgage loans, in that they failed to include a complete list of the properties Tieskotter owned or was in the process of purchasing and falsely indicated that one of Tieskotter’s other properties was leased. Some of the applications were supported by fictitious leases.

They also hid from lenders the extent of Tieskotter’s liabilities for other mortgages by preparing and submitting applications for multiple loans, secured by multiple properties, before such liabilities would appear on Tieskotter’s credit reports. This practice further affected the lenders’ ability to assess Tieskotter’s ability to re-pay the loans for which he was applying. White was aware that these multiple applications were being prepared and that they did not reflect all of Tieskotter’s liabilities.

Tieskotter and Patterson received money from the transactions at the time of closing by causing the disbursement at closing of additional monies to PK Design Group, LLC, an entity controlled by Patterson, or Dream Design, a trade name for an entity controlled by Tieskotter. Tieskotter and Patterson concealed from the lenders and other parties associated with the transactions their control of these entities. Tieskotter and Patterson also misrepresented that these monies would be used entirely for repairs or improvements to the properties, which led the lenders to falsely believe that the value of their collateral would increase as a result of these payments. White assisted with this process by providing versions of the real estate purchase contracts which omitted the provisions indicating that monies would be disbursed at closing to PK Design Group, LLC or Dream Design to the real estate appraiser and to Patterson, who in turn provided them to the lenders. This practice improperly helped generate appraisals with sufficient value to allow Tieskotter and Patterson to receive money back at the closing.

White also generated a contract for Tieskotter to purchase a property located at 19044 E. Prentice, Centennial, Colorado. Although the actual contract provided that Dream Design would receive $32,500 at closing, White provided a version of the contract to the appraiser which omitted this provision. Then, on or about May 20, 2005, there was an interstate wire transfer of $294,828.82 from the Bank of New York to a Land Title account in Lakewood, Colorado, in order to fund the fraudulently obtained loan Tieskotter used to purchase this property.

Tieskotter was sentenced by Judge Blackburn to serve nine months in prison followed by nine months of home detention, and then three years of supervised release. He was also ordered to pay restitution totaling $1,181,528.28. Patterson was sentenced to serve 10 months in prison, followed by 10 months of home detention, and then three years of supervised release. He was also ordered to pay $1,181,528.28 in restitution joint and severally with Tieskotter.

“The investigation and prosecution of mortgage fraud is a top priority of the Justice Department and this office,” said U.S. Attorney John Walsh. “Prosecuting these cases helps protect the integrity of the housing market.”

“Mortgage fraud directly threatens the financial health of the communities in which we live. IRS Criminal Investigation will continue to pursue individuals who commit mortgage fraud,” said Sean Sowards, Special Agent in Charge, IRS Criminal Investigation, Denver Field Office.

“Mortgage fraud continues to be a serious crime problem affecting all citizens,” said FBI Denver Division Special Agent in Charge James Yacone. “The FBI, along with its state and federal law enforcement partners, will continue to pursue these investigations.”

Denver Division Inspector in Charge, Oscar S. Villanueva, stated the following: “U.S. Postal Inspectors worked diligently with the FBI and IRS in this investigation. The U.S. Postal Inspection Service continues to give top priority in its investigation to those who use the U.S. mail to perpetrate crimes against the American people. Our primary focus has been to identify any financial institutions and mortgage lenders who are harmed by these schemes; and preserve assets obtained through criminal proceedings. We work to bring to justice those who were involved in this criminal activity and prevent further victimization.”

Wire fraud carries a penalty of not more than 20 years’ imprisonment, and up to a $250,000 fine, per count.

This case was investigated by the Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation (IRS CI), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the United States Postal Inspection Service (USPIS).

The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew Kirsch.

Mortgage fraud is a major part of President Barack Obama’s Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force, which was established to wage an aggressive, coordinated, and proactive effort to investigate and prosecute financial crimes. The task force includes representatives from a broad range of federal agencies, regulatory authorities, inspectors general, and state and local law enforcement who, working together, bring to bear a powerful array of criminal and civil enforcement resources. The task force is working to improve efforts across the federal executive branch, and with state and local partners, to investigate and prosecute significant financial crimes, ensure just and effective punishment for those who perpetrate financial crimes, combat discrimination in the lending and financial markets, and recover proceeds for victims of financial crimes.

James J. Goldberg, who did business as JJG Real Estate Appraisal Services (“Goldberg“), and Robert Micheline, who did business as P&M Appraisals (“Micheline“), allegedly conspired with a group of flip sellers, including Buy A Home, LLC and Mitchell Cohen (“Cohen“), and a mortgage lender, Cambridge Home Capital LLC (“Cambridge“), to commit mortgage fraud in connection with the sale of residential properties in the New York area. The two appraisers have settled the mortgage fraud claims via consent orders approved by U.S. District Judge P. Kevin Castel. Under these consent orders, the two appraisers will pay a total of $100,000 in penalties and damages to the United States, and will be barred from performing appraisals in sales involving federally-insured mortgage loans for several years.

According to the allegations in the Complaint and the consent orders filed in Manhattan federal court: The two appraisers who settled with the Government Specifically, Goldberg and Micheline overstated the value of 11 homes in their appraisal reports, enabling Cohen to sell the properties to inexperienced home-buyers at inflated prices, and enabling Cambridge to issue mortgage loans at inflated amounts. All 11 sales for which Goldberg and Micheline provided appraisals involved loans insured by the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (“HUD”), and all defaulted within months after the closing. Although Goldberg and Micheline received only a few thousand dollars for issuing their appraisals, they were critical to the fraudulent flip sale schemes, which enabled other defendants to reap hundreds of thousands of dollars in ill-gotten profits, and put the Government at risk for millions of dollars in potential losses.

Pursuant to the consent order obtained by the United States, as to Goldberg, which was approved by the Court on June 27, 2011, Goldberg agreed to pay $75,000 in civil penalties to the United States. Goldberg also agreed not to participate in any HUD program for three years, and agreed not to conduct or supervise any appraisals in connection with transactions that involve HUD-insured mortgage loans.

Pursuant to the consent order obtained by the United States, as to Micheline, which was approved by the Court on April 29, 2011, Micheline agreed to pay $15,000 in damages and $10,000 in civil penalties to the United States. Micheline also agreed not to participate in any HUD program for five years.

Preet Bharara, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and Michael P. Stephens, Deputy Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of the Inspector General (“HUD-OIG”) announced the consent orders.

Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara stated: “Appraisers serve as gate-keepers who ensure that mortgage loans are not based on inflated valuations. It is troubling when they disregard this important duty in order to ‘hit the numbers’ and help facilitate unlawful real estate transactions. I applaud the efforts of our Civil Frauds Unit and HUD-OIG for uncovering this fraud and holding these appraisers accountable.”

Deputy Inspector General for HUD-OIG MICHAEL P. STEPHENS stated: “HUG OIG is committed to ensuring the integrity of the FHA program. When an appraiser fails to do the work that they were paid to do, or fraudulently inflates the value of the home, it not only affects the homeowner, but also the community around it. This case represents an example of how we vigilantly hold appraisers accountable for the work that we count on them to do.”

The case is being handled by the Office’s Civil Frauds Unit. Mr. Bharara established the Civil Frauds Unit in March of 2010 to bring renewed focus and additional resources to combating financial fraud, including mortgage fraud. The Civil Frauds Unit works in coordination with President Obama’s Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force, on which Mr. Bharara serves as a Co-Chair of the Securities and Commodities Fraud Working Group. President Obama established the interagency Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force to wage an aggressive, coordinated, and proactive effort to investigate and prosecute financial crimes. The task force includes representatives from a broad range of federal agencies, regulatory authorities, inspectors general, and state and local law enforcement who, working together, bring to bear a powerful array of criminal and civil enforcement resources. The task force is working to improve efforts across the federal executive branch, and with state and local partners, to investigate and prosecute significant financial crimes, ensure just and effective punishment for those who perpetrate financial crimes, combat discrimination in the lending and financial markets, and recover proceeds for victims of financial crimes.

Assistant U.S. Attorneys Li Yu and Cristine Irvin Phillips are in charge of the case.

Isaac Jerome Smith, 48, Spotsylvania, Virginia; and Alvita Karen Gunn, 33, Hanover, Maryland, were sentenced by U.S. District Judge Roger W. Titus to 70 months and 60 months in prison, each followed by three years of supervised release, respectively, for a fraud conspiracy, wire fraud and conspiracy to commit money laundering in connection with their participation in a massive mortgage fraud scheme which promised to pay off homeowners’ mortgages on their “Dream Homes,” but left them to fend for themselves. Judge Titus also ordered that the defendants pay restitution in the full amount of the loss, with the exact amount to be determined at a later hearing.

On February 18, 2011, a federal jury convicted Smith and Gunn, along with co-defendant Michael Anthony Hickson, 48, Commack, New York, after a six week trial. Hickson, chief financial officer of Metro Dream Homes (MDH), was also convicted of making a false statement in a federal court proceeding and is scheduled to be sentenced on July 1, 2011.

According to evidence presented at the trial, beginning in 2005, the defendants targeted homeowners and home purchasers to participate in a purported mortgage payment program called the “Dream Homes Program.” In exchange for a minimum $50,000 initial investment and an “administrative fee” of up to $5,000, the conspirators promised to make the homeowners’ future monthly mortgage payments, and pay off the homeowners’ mortgages within five to seven years. Dream Homes Program representatives told investors that the homeowners’ initial investments would be used to fund investments in automated teller machines (ATMs), flat screen televisions that would show paid business advertisements and electronic kiosks that sold goods and services. To give investors the impression that the Dream Homes Program was very successful, Metro Dream Homes spent hundreds of thousands of dollars making presentations at luxury hotels in Washington, D.C., New York, New York and Beverly Hills, California.

The evidence showed that in February 2007, the Dream Homes Program added a second program called “POS Dream Homes” offering similar promises of paying off investor mortgages in five to seven years in exchange for an up-front investment of $50,000 or more. Collectively, these programs had offices in Maryland, the District of Columbia, Virginia, North Carolina, New York, Delaware, Florida, Georgia and California.

According to trial testimony, the defendants failed to advise investors that: the ATMs, TV advertising and kiosks never generated any meaningful revenue; the defendants used the funds from later investors to pay the mortgages of earlier investors; and MDH had never filed any federal income tax returns. The defendants also failed to advise investors that their investments were being used to enrich select MDH employees, including the defendants, to: pay salaries of up to $200,000 a year as well as their mortgages; employ a staff of chauffeurs and maintain a fleet of luxury cars; and attend the 2007 National Basketball Association All-Star game and the 2007 National Football League Super Bowl, staying in luxury accommodations in both instances. Nor were investors told that investor funds were used to: pay off investors in a prior failed ATM investment venture called Bankcard Group; make multiple donations of up to $50,000 to charitable organizations to give MDH the appearance of being financially successful; and transfer millions of dollars in investor funds to third-party businesses for purposes not disclosed to investors.

Trial testimony showed that the defendants arranged for early Dream Homes Program investors, whose mortgage payments had been made by MDH using the funds of later Dream Homes Program investors, to attend recruitment meetings to assure potential investors that the Dream Homes Program was not a fraud. MDH used a third party company to pay investors to advertise the Dream Homes Program to friends and family. MDH encouraged homeowners to refinance existing mortgages on their homes in order to withdraw equity and generate the funds necessary to enroll their homes in the Dream Homes Program.

On Aug. 15, 2007, the Maryland Securities Commissioner issued a cease-and-desist order to MDH and other related companies directing them to immediately cease the offering and sale of unregistered securities in connection with their promotion of the Dream Homes Program. The defendants subsequently called meetings in which investors were told that MDH was earning up to $10 million per month and that the company’s legal difficulties were the result of either misunderstandings or racial animus against company leaders. On Sept. 4, 2007, the defendants filed a legal challenge to the cease-and-desist order in federal court in Maryland. Trial testimony established that at a hearing on Sept. 12, 2007, Hickson testified that the financial success of the Dream Homes Program did not rely upon new investor funds, when in fact Hickson knew that the sole source of meaningful revenue for MDH was new investor funds.

As a result of the scheme, more than 1,000 investors in the Dream Homes Program invested approximately $78 million. When the defendants stopped making the mortgage payments, the homeowners were left to attempt to make the mortgage payments MDH had promised to make in full.

Carole Nelson, 52, Washington, D.C., the chief financial officer of POS Dream Homes, previously pleaded guilty to money laundering, and Charlotte Melissa Josephine Hardmon, 39, Bowie, Maryland, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit wire fraud in connection with their participation in this scheme. Both are awaiting sentencing.

This prosecution is being brought jointly by the Maryland and Washington, D.C. Mortgage Fraud Task Forces, which are comprised of federal, state and local law enforcement agencies in Maryland, Washington, D.C. and Northern Virginia. The Task Forces were formed to promote the early detection, identification, prevention and prosecution of various kinds of mortgage fraud schemes. This case, as well as other cases brought by members of the Task Forces, demonstrates the commitment of law enforcement agencies to protect consumers from fraud and help to ensure the integrity of the mortgage market and other credit markets. Information about mortgage fraud prosecutions is available on the internet at http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/md/Mortgage-Fraud/index.html.

The sentences were announced by United States Attorney for the District of Maryland Rod J. Rosenstein; Special Agent in Charge Richard A. McFeely of the Federal Bureau of Investigation; Acting Special Agent in Charge Jeannine A. Hammett of the Internal Revenue Service – Criminal Investigation, Washington, D.C. Field Office; Maryland Attorney General Douglas F. Gansler; and Inspector General Jon T. Rymer of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

“Mortgage fraud ruins lives, destroys families and devastates whole communities. This case demonstrates the FBI’s commitment to attacking the problem from every possible direction,” said FBI Special Agent in Charge Richard A. McFeely. “We will not rest until those who prey on vulnerable American homeowners are brought to justice.”

United States Attorney Rod J. Rosenstein praised the FBI, the IRS – Criminal Investigation, the Maryland Attorney General’s Office – Securities Division and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation – Office of Inspector General for their investigative work. Mr. Rosenstein thanked Assistant U.S. Attorneys Jonathan C. Su and Bryan E. Foreman, who prosecuted the case.